Write My Essay We are the most trusted essay writing service. Get the best essays delivered by experienced UK & US essay writers at affordable prices.
We can work on Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation
List the purpose and goals of an in-service session focusing on safe medication administration for nurses. Explain the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to medication administration. Explain to the audience their role and importance of making the improvement plan focusing on medication administration successful. Create resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improvement initiative on medication administration. Communicate with nurses in a respectful and informative way that clearly presents expectations and solicits feedback on communication strategies for future improvement.
There are various ways to structure an in-service session below is just one example:
Part 1: Agenda and Outcomes. Explain to your audience what they are going to learn or do, and what they are expected to take away. Part 2: Safety Improvement Plan. Give an overview of the current problem focusing on medication administration, the proposed plan, and what the improvement plan is trying to address. Explain why it is important for the organization to address the current situation. Part 3: Audience's Role and Importance. Discuss how the staff audience will be expected to help implement and drive the improvement plan. Explain why they are critical to the success of the improvement plan focusing on medication administration. Describe how their work could benefit from embracing their role in the plan. Part 4: New Process and Skills Practice. Explain new processes or skills. Develop an activity that allows the staff audience to practice and ask questions about these new processes and skills. In the notes section of your PowerPoint, brainstorm potential responses to likely questions or concerns. Part 5: Soliciting Feedback. Describe how you would solicit feedback from the audience on the improvement plan and the in-service. Explain how you might integrate this feedback for future improvements.
Sample Solution
As explained in the view of Sayyid Qutb, âIslam is irreconcilable with the main assumptions of democratic government, and therefore Islam and democracy are incompatibleâ[11]. This view is supported by Huntington, writing that âthe nature of Islamic culture [is] inhospitable [to] democracyâ[12], since âdemocracy clashes with the Islamic notion of the sovereignty of God [and means] taking power from the hands of its usurpers and restoring it to God aloneâ[11]. In this regard, we can see how Islamic countries may be less likely to democratise and thus be more rigidly stuck in an authoritarian regime; holding beliefs which perhaps do not align as well with democratic governments. It could be argued, for example, that Sharia Law can foster the unequal treatment of women, while it has made space for âa violent Islamic radical movement: Boko Haram, [which] proffers religious authoritarianism as an alternative to democracyâ[13]. The extent to which this is true is, of course, debatable, particularly since âSharia movements draw popular support, especially from lower and middle class Muslims, [since the movements support] social, economic and political reforms meant to provide economic and physical security and accountabilityâ[13]. M. Steven Fish builds on this point, arguing that the âunusual degree of subordination of women in Muslim societiesâ[19] is not actually caused by an oppressive nature of the religion itself; rather, the position of women has been determined by the historically âkin-based political power [in the] North African countriesâ[19] . Moreover, according to Freedom House, Indonesia, âthe most populous Muslim country in the world, receives very high scores for both civil rights and political rightsâ[14]; a certain demonstration of the compatibility of Islam with democracy in a contemporary real-world scenario. It may therefore not be as great a contributing factor in the survival of non-democratic regimes as one might have expected. A third possible explanation for the lengthy survival of a non-democratic regime could be a small winning coalition.>
As explained in the view of Sayyid Qutb, âIslam is irreconcilable with the main assumptions of democratic government, and therefore Islam and democracy are incompatibleâ[11]. This view is supported by Huntington, writing that âthe nature of Islamic culture [is] inhospitable [to] democracyâ[12], since âdemocracy clashes with the Islamic notion of the sovereignty of God [and means] taking power from the hands of its usurpers and restoring it to God aloneâ[11]. In this regard, we can see how Islamic countries may be less likely to democratise and thus be more rigidly stuck in an authoritarian regime; holding beliefs which perhaps do not align as well with democratic governments. It could be argued, for example, that Sharia Law can foster the unequal treatment of women, while it has made space for âa violent Islamic radical movement: Boko Haram, [which] proffers religious authoritarianism as an alternative to democracyâ[13]. The extent to which this is true is, of course, debatable, particularly since âSharia movements draw popular support, especially from lower and middle class Muslims, [since the movements support] social, economic and political reforms meant to provide economic and physical security and accountabilityâ[13]. M. Steven Fish builds on this point, arguing that the âunusual degree of subordination of women in Muslim societiesâ[19] is not actually caused by an oppressive nature of the religion itself; rather, the position of women has been determined by the historically âkin-based political power [in the] North African countriesâ[19] . Moreover, according to Freedom House, Indonesia, âthe most populous Muslim country in the world, receives very high scores for both civil rights and political rightsâ[14]; a certain demonstration of the compatibility of Islam with democracy in a contemporary real-world scenario. It may therefore not be as great a contributing factor in the survival of non-democratic regimes as one might have expected. A third possible explanation for the lengthy survival of a non-democratic regime could be a small winning coalition.>
Is this question part of your Assignment?
We can help
Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.
We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals