We can work on Impact and Prevention of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses

Review the readings and videos in the resources section of this module addressing the history of safety and
health in the workplace, as well as those addressing the costs and benefits of safety and health programs. With
the advent of OSHA regulations established in the United States, and with other regulations internationally, we
have actually come a long way in reducing workplace injuries. In 1970, when OSHA was created and when we
had far fewer workers in the workplace, the Vietnam war was on the minds of all Americans. The video states
that in 1968, at the height of the war, 14,000 troops were killed in Vietnam. However, 14,000 workers were
killed at home on the job. Another 2.5 million workers suffered a disabling injury, which was 54 times that
wounded in the war. OSHA was viewed by some as “Big Brother” back then (read Orwell’s “1984” for context),
but the story of OSHA was and is that a safe and healthy workplace makes good business sense. And yet, we
still have around 5,000 occupational fatalities in the US every year.
Let’s start a discussion around the role of safety and health programs and the role of the safety and health
professional in a business organization. First, delineate the impact of occupational fatalities, injuries, and
illnesses as a significant public health problem and cost to individuals, communities, and especially business
organizations. What are the costs to organizations of on-the-job injuries and illnesses? What is the social
burden of continuing to have workplace illnesses and injuries?
Next, knowing that the American Society of Safety Professionals was founded (as the United Society of
Casualty Inspectors) in 1911 after the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire, the American Society of American
Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists was formed in 1938, and the American Industrial Hygiene
Association was formed in 1939, imagine yourself as a safety and health professional at a company before the
establishment of OSHA regulations in 1970. What historical relevance and information did the videos and
readings provide that helped you understand the need for an occupational safety and health program? Do we
need regulations to mandate safety programs, or can we justify injury and illness prevention programs by
understanding the benefits in the wider context of business processes and market and societal influences?
Video Links:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7v2JTQjiCdc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-TXgSQ-0c4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grwXqfEfW3g

Sample Solution

facebook Share on Facebook

Twitter Tweet

Follow Follow us
custom Share
custom Share
custom Share
custom Share
custom Share

In the present economy with quick changes because of globalization and digitalization great authority could assume a pivotal job, and so as to have great pioneers organizations need to characterize a methodology for initiative improvement. It is even said that ”organizations that neglect to put constantly in the pioneers of tomorrow may wind up falling behind their rivals” (Schatsky and Schwartz, 2015, p. 21). The pioneers of things to come may require various abilities then today and accordingly it’s something essential for organizations to consider. Characterizing the significance of a technique for authority improvement and worldwide pioneers is fundamental for this examination. In this exploration an initiative improvement technique can be portrayed as ”the abilities and conduct that are expected to execute the business system and make the ideal culture (aptitudes, capabilities, information base)” (Pasmore, 2014, p. 3). So as to discover a response to the focal inquiry “In what manner should organizations arrange their future technique for administration improvement?” this examination begins with a writing audit. As per the Royal Literary Fund a writing survey is ”a hunt and assessment of the accessible writing in your given subject or picked theme zone” (”What is a writing review?”, 2014). In this writing survey a few sources are utilized, composed by individuals with experience or information in the field of authority advancement. Together with the examination as a meeting, these sources will discover a response to the exploration question. 3.2 Current focal point of administration advancement A few people have a characteristic blessing or ability in being a pioneer and others have to build up these aptitudes. Consequently, organizations have created systems and set up initiative improvement programs for future pioneers to get the essential aptitudes. The manner in which initiative advancement is done fluctuates from organization to organization. Some emphasis more on specialized aptitudes, some more on social abilities. Some beginning effectively ahead of schedule with building up their workers, some have initiative projects just for their top representatives. The significance and level of speculations likewise shifts. For instance, it could rely upon how quick an organization is developing or what patterns are in the market. It is said that ”numerous global organizations, especially Japanese, Indian, German and some American ones, still pack fundamental choices in the hands of a little gathering of confided in pioneers from their nation of origin” (George, 2012, p.1). In any case, as development for worldwide organizations originates from developing markets there is a need to have numerous pioneers who can comprehend nearby societies. The present spotlight is basically on authority advancement by sending the little gathering of national pioneers to assignments in different nations (George, 2012). 3.3 Market improvements There are likewise changes in the market or outside condition that should be considered when creating pioneers. The manner in which organizations were overseen before probably won’t work later on. Hence, the inquiry is what are the most significant market changes and patterns that impact administration advancement? An intriguing examination dependent on a study with 194 respondents and 33 meetings with top officials of worldwide organizations was performed by Gitsham (2009). The discoveries are that few patterns are relied upon to have an effect on future dangers or openings and they can be outlined into, the common habitat, globalization and new weights. The indigenous habitat since common assets, for example, vitality, are getting all the more rare. Globalization identifies with circumstances in developing markets. There are additionally new weights since certain associations have an expanding impact in guideline, popular assessments and purchaser inclinations (Gitsham, 2009). How organizations react to showcase advancements assumes a job in how fruitful they are. They can make new items or use developments to change their creation, however as a rule the respondents of the review think a change in hierarchical abilities and culture is similarly as significant. Pioneers, administrators and representatives are required to build up their insight and abilities. Ordinarily it has been simpler to concentrate on hard aptitudes, however delicate abilities ought to likewise get more consideration. Associations are intricate and comprise of numerous representatives with casual connections and systems and in this way a culture with singular administration as opposed to concentrating on formal chains of importance is being considered (Gitsham, 2009). Shyamal Jani, who is learned about the most ideal methods for sorting out a future procedure for authority improvement, affirms this. He says that ”in the event that you need to create pioneers, who consider was is best for an organization, joint effort to accomplish results ought to be animated more” (S. Jani, individual correspondence, November 20, 2015). 3.4 Leaderships abilities As per the examination of Gitsham there are a couple of explicit aptitudes vital for worldwide pioneers in light of the market advancements portrayed above (Gitsham, 2009). The aptitudes can be bunched as setting, unpredictability and connectedness. Shyamal adds to this that, ”later on, initiative advancement will be significantly progressively centered around close to home abilities rather than information” (S. Jani, individual correspondence, November 20, 2015). In ‘another period for worldwide administration improvement’ George (2012) specifies that pioneers must be viable in adjusting representatives around the organization’s strategic qualities and enable others to lead. In logical inconsistency to customary administration this implies order is less significant and pioneers ought to have the option to contact individuals of various societies and ensure they embrace the estimations of the organization. At the point when the attention is on these qualities, individuals are likewise ready to settle on their own choices dependent on this and joint effort is animated. 3.5 Future initiative advancement With the setting of changes in the market and important future authority aptitudes as a top priority a methodology for initiative improvement can be figured. On the off chance that you see globalization, organizations require pioneers who truly comprehend nearby societies. As indicated by George (2012), initiative advancement will be powerful if individuals work and live in a few unique nations rather than just going there from their own headquarter. As he would see it, there ought to likewise be more spotlight on mindfulness and enthusiastic insight. A case of how this can be accomplished is asking exhortation on choices and talking about difficulties and errors. This is upheld by Shyamal’s view that administration projects should utilize instructing at work by senior pioneers. ”It’s excellent to utilize pioneers to create pioneers. In the event that they are included you can learn for their experience and get support if essential” (S. Jani, individual correspondence, November 20, 2015). By that, Shyamal imagines that it’s extremely viable to begin creating them from the get-go in their profession way and to concentrate more on highlighting individual needs (S. Jani, individual correspondence, November 20, 2015). Schatskty and Schwartz (2015) add to this that associations should center their administration advancement at all levels rather than just the key chiefs, on the grounds that the future achievement of an associations relies upon the presentation of the working heads.>

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples