t quote from his book I need to expand on is “Strict teachings … are for the most part dreams, they don’t concede to verification, and nobody can be constrained to think about them as obvious or to have confidence in them.”. This statement adjusts legitimately with his theory since Freud is essentially saying that these tenets haven’t been demonstrated to be genuine individuals just put stock in them so in this way it is “bogus” in his view. Figment’s can’t be demonstrated however he doesn’t characterize them as bogus, he says these figments o How media represent religion riginate from unrealistic reasoning, where somebody needs something to be valid and as a result of that it makes them trust it is valid. This statement has an extremely solid and till this very day causes a lot of debate. Regulations, for example, the good book are continually being examined and applied to our lives now as though it is a book that predicts our eventual fate of this world. The subsequent statement is “It would be pleasant if there were a God who made the world and was a kindhearted fortune, and if there were an ethical request known to man and an existence in the wake of death; however this is actually as we will undoubtedly want it to be.”, and this statement is actually what I referenced in the past section about “unrealistic reasoning”. Numerous individuals today have faith in a divine being and a set method to carry on with your life or “ethics”, and furthermore accept that following these set ways will lead you to an existence in the wake of death. In any case, by and by, this is the result of unrealistic reasoning as indicated by freud and this statement compares with his proposition in view of conviction. This stateme How media represent religion nt is extremely solid since, what number occasions do you hear somebody state “life is the thing that you make it to be” in this manner is we wish it then we unwittingly seek after our unrealistic reasoning.>