For Question 1: ( 250 to 300 words )
You need to choose one of the three jurisdictions (South Africa Central Bank / Qatar Central Bank / UAE Central Bank )
For Question 2: (( 250 to 300 words )
The fine should be on an organization and the jurisdiction should be from the following countries: Bahrain, Qatar, and United Arab emirates. You must not name the company (For example a commercial Bank in the UAE or a Telecommunication company in Qatar)
Question 3: (( 250 to 300 words )
The internal stake holders that you need to talk about are the Compliance officer, Internal auditor or Board of director. (The sector is banking and the Jurisdiction should be Bahrain)
Question 4: ( 650 to 700 words )
You should use at least two references here. Focus mainly in your opinion and explaining your opinion
Question 5 : ( 650 to 700 words )
⢠Do not name the firm by you can reference it for example if you are going to use Huwawi , use a telecommunication firm in China
⢠Examples that you may use is : Huwawi, apple
Question 6: ( 650 to 700 words )
⢠You may use an American firm however do not name but you can reference it
Question 7 : ( 650 words 700 words )
⢠Jurisdiction that should be used is South Africa / Qatar / Bahrain / UAE or Saudi Arabia
Sample Solution
over the past few many years background and lifestyle has end up an vital a part of human beingsâs life, specially in recognize in their enjoyment and traveller activities (Boyd 2003, p.1). that is specifically actual in the case of tourism, wherein the ancient call for for vacationer and leisure sports have waned in favour of these packed with extra cultural factors. there’s an growing preference to go to historic websites, museums and galleries in an strive by using the person to analyze extra approximately their heritage and those of other cultures and social agencies. on the same time, nowadaysâs background tourist has grow to be more discerning about the way that those venues gift history experience to them (Boyd 2003, p.2). In essence therefore, history may Governance Risk and Compliance be seen to relate to ancient activities and settings and the traveller wants to revel in the ones historical reviews as an nearly bodily event. however, despite the numerous researches and survey consequences that supports this alteration in the tourist call Governance Risk and Compliance for, there is nonetheless proof that a number of heritage websites, museums and galleries are failing to react positively to these findings (Black 2005, p.10), which in many cases has led to a drop in vacationer numbers at those venues. this situation can have serious consequences, in particular for the ones background websites that rely upon entrance costs to bridge the distance between nation funding and the running charges of the venue. Even wherein this no longer the ca Governance Risk and Compliance se, as an example in which authorities funding is used to provide free admission, such venues are nonetheless accountable to the kingdom and want to prove that their status quo is handing over to the wishes of the general public, which a discount in traveler numbers will not acquire. for you to address this problem the last two decades have visible an growth in literature associated particularly to the manner wherein history is displayed and portrayed to the visitor, creating a brand new discipline beneath the general name of history interpretation. historical past interpretation relates equally to the expertise of the website or items displayed for the vacationer and the incentive determinant and Governance Risk and Compliance wishes of that traveller (Blockley and Hems 2006, p.1). till these days, most academics agree that background interpretation has been the least developed thing of the venueâs merchandising to the visitor (Boyd 2003 and Blockley and Hems 2006). Interpretation paperwork and vital a part of the tourist enjoy and will affect the Governance Risk and Compliance revel in that they remove from the visit (Boyd 2003, p.193). consequently, it follows that understanding what motivates a visitor or group of visitors will permit the museum, gallery or history web page to be higher capable of display and promote their product (ibid 2003, p.sixty four). For most site visitors that motivation can be to gain satisfaction and getting to know from the object or activity being displayed. In maximum cases, as Blockley and Hems (2006, p.10) recommend in their researc>
over the past few many years background and lifestyle has end up an vital a part of human beingsâs life, specially in recognize in their enjoyment and traveller activities (Boyd 2003, p.1). that is specifically actual in the case of tourism, wherein the ancient call for for vacationer and leisure sports have waned in favour of these packed with extra cultural factors. there’s an growing preference to go to historic websites, museums and galleries in an strive by using the person to an Governance Risk and Compliance alyze extra approximately their heritage and those of other cultures and social agencies. on the same time, nowadaysâs background tourist has grow to be more discerning about the way that those venues gift history experience to them (Boyd 2003, p.2). In essence therefore, history may be seen to relate to ancient activities and settings and the traveller wants to revel in the ones historical reviews as an nearly bodily event. however, despite the numerous researches and survey consequences that supports this alteration in the tourist call fo Governance Risk and Compliance r, there is nonetheless proof that a number of heritage websites, museums and galleries are failing to react positively to these findings (Black 2005, p.10), which in many cases has led to a drop in vacationer numbers at those venues. this situation can have serious consequences, in particular for the ones background websites that rely upon entrance costs to bridge the distance between nation funding and the running charges of the venue. Even wherein this no longer the Governance Risk and Compliance case, as an example in which authorities funding is used to provide free admission, such venues are nonetheless accountable to the kingdom and want to prove that their status quo is handing over to the wishes of the general public, which a discount in traveler numbers will not acquire. for you to address this problem the last two decades have visible an growth in literature associated particularly to the manner wherein history is displayed and portrayed to the visitor, creating a brand new discipline beneath the general name of history interpretation. historical past interpretation relates equally to the expertise of the website or items displayed for the vacationer and the incentive determinant and wishes of that traveller (Blockley and Hems 2006, p.1). till these days, most academics agree that background interpretation has been the least developed thing of the venueâs merchandising to the visitor (Boyd 2003 and Blockley and Hems 2006). Interpretation paperwork and vital a part of the tourist enjoy and will affect the revel in that they remove from the visit (Boyd 2003, p.193). consequently, it follows that understanding what motivates a visitor or group of visitors will permit the Governance Risk and Compliance museum, gallery or history web page to be higher capable of display and promote their product (ibid 2003, p.sixty four). For most site visitors that motivation can be to gain satisfaction and getting to know from the object or activity being displayed. In maximum cases, as Blockley and Hems (2006, p.10) recommend in their rese Governance Risk and Compliance arc>