Write My Essay We are the most trusted essay writing service. Get the best essays delivered by experienced UK & US essay writers at affordable prices.
We can work on Global IT strategies, technologies, models
We looked at several topics on global IT strategies, technologies, models, and networking during this session. As you get closer to starting your own dissertation, you will need to choose a topic in your first dissertation class, DSRT-736, so it is essential to start preparing.This week, let us take a look at some topics to consider, and by the end of the week, we could have several ideas for dissertation topics. Since you have already examined several research articles, another way would be to examine previous dissertations in these areas. Visit the University of Cumberlandâs library, go to the Dissertation Database, and locate an interesting topic on global IT. Here are some pointers that will help critically evaluate some viable topics.
Is the topic attainable for a first-time dissertation student? Is the problem rooted in the literature? Is the research empirical, i.e., is there a survey, is there an interview guide, has the data been analyzed via some statistical tool? Is there a theoretical model or framework discussed? Discuss the topic, the problem the model has been used in the research, and any present findings. Do not read the entire dissertation, as the abstract and chapter one introduction should give a clear understanding of the research
Sample Solution
hich refers to the protection of political and territorial rights, along with human rights. In contemporary view, this view is more complicated to answer, given the rise of globalisation. Similarly, it is difficult to measure proportionality, particularly in war, because not only that there is an epistemic problem in calculating, but again todayâs world has developed (Frowe (2011), Page 54-6). Furthermore, Vittola argues war is necessary, not only for defensive purposes, âsince it is lawful to resist force with force,â but also to fight against the unjust, an offensive war, nations which are not punished for acting unjustly towards its own people or have unjustly taken land from the home nation (Begby et al (2006b), Page 310&313); to âteach its enemies a lesson,â but mainly to achieve the aim of war. This validates Aristotleâs argument: âthere must be war for the sake of peace (Aristotle (1996), Page 187). However, Frowe argues âself-defenceâ has a plurality of descriptions, seen in Chapter 1, showing that self-defence cannot always justify oneâs actions. Even more problematic, is the case of self-defence in war, where two conflicting views are established: The Collectivists, a whole new theory and the Individualists, the continuation of the domestic theory of self-defence (Frowe (2011), Page 9& 29-34). More importantly, Frowe refutes Vittolaâs view on vengeance because firstly it empowers the punisherâs authority, but also todayâs world prevents this action between countries through legal bodies like the UN, since we have modernised into a relatively peaceful society (Frowe (2011), Page 80-1). Most importantly, Frowe further refutes Vittola through his claim that âright intention cannot be used as an excuse to wage war in response to anticipated wrong,â suggesting we cannot just harm another just because they have done something unjust. Other factors need to be considered, for example, Proportionality.>
GET ANSWER
Share on Facebook
Tweet
Follow us
hich refers to the protection of political and territorial rights, along with human rights. In contemporary view, this view is more complicated to answer, given the rise of globalisation. Similarly, it is difficult to measure proportionality, particularly in war, because not only that there is an epistemic problem in calculating, but again todayâs world has developed (Frowe (2011), Page 54-6). Furthermore, Vittola argues war is necessary, not only for defensive purposes, âsince it is lawful to resist force with force,â but also to fight against the unjust, an offensive war, nations which are not punished for acting unjustly towards its own people or have unjustly taken land from the home nation (Begby et al (2006b), Page 310&313); to âteach its enemies a lesson,â but mainly to achieve the aim of war. This validates Aristotleâs argument: âthere must be war for the sake of peace (Aristotle (1996), Page 187). However, Frowe argues âself-defenceâ has a plurality of descriptions, seen in Chapter 1, showing that self-defence cannot always justify oneâs actions. Even more problematic, is the case of self-defence in war, where two conflicting views are established: The Collectivists, a whole new theory and the Individualists, the continuation of the domestic theory of self-defence (Frowe (2011), Page 9& 29-34). More importantly, Frowe refutes Vittolaâs view on vengeance because firstly it empowers the punisherâs authority, but also todayâs world prevents this action between countries through legal bodies like the UN, since we have modernised into a relatively peaceful society (Frowe (2011), Page 80-1). Most importantly, Frowe further refutes Vittola through his claim that âright intention cannot be used as an excuse to wage war in response to anticipated wrong,â suggesting we cannot just harm another just because they have done something unjust. Other factors need to be considered, for example, Proportionality.>
Is this question part of your Assignment?
We can help
Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.
We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals
