Below are links to a variety of evidence based assessment tools. Choose one of them.
Choose one of the following evidence based assessment tools. If you have another you would like to address, please email me with the tool. I will let you know if it will work for this assignment
Braden Scale https://www.in.gov/health/files/Braden_Scale.pdf
Caregiver Strain Index. http://www.npcrc.org/files/news/caregiver_strain_index.pdf
Geriatric Depression Scale https://geriatrictoolkit.missouri.edu/cog/GDS_SHORT_FORM.PDF https://geriatrictoolkit.missouri.edu/cog/GDS_SHORT_FORM.PDF
John Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/institute_nursing/models_tools/jhfrat_acute%20care%20original_6_ 22_17.pdf
Mini Nutrition Assessment – Short Form
https://www.mna-elderly.com/sites/default/files/2021-10/mna-guide-english-sf.pdf
STEADI fall risk tool. https://www.cdc.gov/steadi/pdf/STEADI-Form-RiskFactorsCk-508.pdf
Remember to determine what factors are contributing to the concern before trying to intervene!! For example, if a person is at risk for falling due to orthostatic hypotension, removing throw rugs (although good) is probably not the optimal intervention.
A patient and family centered care plan is only as good as the assessment it is based on. Using evidencebased assessment tools, relevant to the unique situation can help the nurse uncover data and contributing factors that can be easily overlooked. If the root of the problem is not identified, it likely will not be addressed. Positive outcomes may not be achieved. The Joint Commission recommends use of these tools when assessing risk for some things – ex. falls (The Joint Commission).
Part One: Choose one of the tools included above and respond to the following questions adhering to the criteria in the rubric.
1) State which tool you are reviewing.
2) What contributing/risk factors are assessed by the assessment tool?
Sample Solution
So, what characteristics did Machiavelli think would actually make a strong leader? His ideal prince is one who is cunning and ruthless. Machiavelli believed that, âa ruler who wishes to maintain his power must be prepared to act immorally when this becomes necessaryâ (26). A ruler should also not be worried about being miserly, for overall this will help rather than hurt his control (Mansfield). If a prince is too generous his people will also become accustomed to such generosity and be angered when it is not forthcoming, and in the long run he will have to tax his people to make up for what he has given away. Such ideas went directly against the Christian and humanist ideas about morality in Machiavelliâs time. Another major point of interest that Machiavelli discussed throughout The Prince was the concept of fortune and its role in a princes rule. He believed that it was of the utmost importance that a prince try to win fortune to his side as best he can. Here again, Machiavelli differentiates from his predecessors. Many past philosophers believed that fortune would smile upon a ruler who was just and virtuous. Machiavelli disagreed with such notions. Morales had nothing to do with pleasing fortune. Instead, it was the more violent and ambitious ruler, who would seize the moment, that would have a better chance of winning fortune (Spencer). Machiavelli went so far as to compare fortune to a woman and stated that, âIf you want to control her, it is necessary to treat her roughlyâ (87). While Machiavelli did not think it was in a princeâs best interest to always be kind and good, he did note the importance of his subjects thinking him to be so. It is very hard to hold control a region, in which the people believe their ruler to be completely immoral. However, they may put up with questionable actions of a ruler if once in a while he does something that appears to be in their best interest. The crueler a ruler is the more crucial it is to appear to the public as being the opposite. Once the people are convinced of a ruler being virtuous, he will be able to get away with the most unscrupulous behavior. Most people would consider it essential for a ruler to keep his promises and appear trustworthy, maintaining a good relationship with his subjects, not Machiavelli. Sometimes it is not realistic for a ruler to be able to make good on every promise. It may even be better for the people in the long run if he does not. A prince should not have qualms about breaking his word, âplausible reasons can always be found for such failure to keep promisesâ (Machiavelli 62). Moreover, if a prince prides himself on always keeping h>
GET ANSWER
So, what characteristics did Machiavelli think would actually make a strong leader? His ideal prince is one who is cunning and ruthless. Machiavelli believed that, âa ruler who wishes to maintain his power must be prepared to act immorally when this becomes necessaryâ (26). A ruler should also not be worried about being miserly, for overall this will help rather than hurt his control (Mansfield). If a prince is too generous his people will also become accustomed to such generosity and be angered when it is not forthcoming, and in the long run he will have to tax his people to make up for what he has given away. Such ideas went directly against the Christian and humanist ideas about morality in Machiavelliâs time. Another major point of interest that Machiavelli discussed throughout The Prince was the concept of fortune and its role in a princes rule. He believed that it was of the utmost importance that a prince try to win fortune to his side as best he can. Here again, Machiavelli differentiates from his predecessors. Many past philosophers believed that fortune would smile upon a ruler who was just and virtuous. Machiavelli disagreed with such notions. Morales had nothing to do with pleasing fortune. Instead, it was the more violent and ambitious ruler, who would seize the moment, that would have a better chance of winning fortune (Spencer). Machiavelli went so far as to compare fortune to a woman and stated that, âIf you want to control her, it is necessary to treat her roughlyâ (87). While Machiavelli did not think it was in a princeâs best interest to always be kind and good, he did note the importance of his subjects thinking him to be so. It is very hard to hold control a region, in which the people believe their ruler to be completely immoral. However, they may put up with questionable actions of a ruler if once in a while he does something that appears to be in their best interest. The crueler a ruler is the more crucial it is to appear to the public as being the opposite. Once the people are convinced of a ruler being virtuous, he will be able to get away with the most unscrupulous behavior. Most people would consider it essential for a ruler to keep his promises and appear trustworthy, maintaining a good relationship with his subjects, not Machiavelli. Sometimes it is not realistic for a ruler to be able to make good on every promise. It may even be better for the people in the long run if he does not. A prince should not have qualms about breaking his word, âplausible reasons can always be found for such failure to keep promisesâ (Machiavelli 62). Moreover, if a prince prides himself on always keeping h>
