– Identify the disorders that make up the comorbidities you selected, as well as associated alterations. List the pathophysiology of the alterations, including changes that occur in at least two body systems. Be specific.
– Identify at least three signs and symptoms associated with the pathologies of your selected comorbidities that would guide the collection of information from conducting a patient health assessment.
– Identify the types of drugs that might be prescribed to treat alterations associated with the patientâs comorbidities. Be specific and provide examples.
⢠List specific genetic, gender, ethnicity, age, and/or behavior considerations that might impact the pathophysiology of the alterations you identified and the effects of prescribed drugs.
⢠Provide links to materials from at least two supporting agencies to educate patients on the disorders, treatment options, management, and self-care.
Part II: Written Narrative: Analyzing Comorbidities in Complex Patient Case Presentations to Inform Nurse and Patient Education (3â4 pages)
⢠Explain how the alterations of each comorbid disorder impact each other. Be specific.
⢠Explain how potential interactions between the medications that might be prescribed to treat the patient’s comorbid conditions justify the selection of the medications for this patient.
⢠Summarize how the information presented in your complex patient case presentation would guide you, as a nurse educator, to advocate for the patient and communicate approaches for promoting positive patient outcomes.
⢠Recommend education strategies on how you would use the materials from the supporting agencies you identified to educate patients on the disorders, treatment options, management, and self-care.
⢠Justify how these education strategies would contribute to positive patient outcomes. Be specific and provide examples.
Sample Solution
America in the mid-1780’s was tormented with monetary disarray that started from congress’ powerlessness to oversee exchange. Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress had restricted capacity to manage exchange. Congress was just ready to control take with Native American clans and, and still, at the end of the day, just on the off chance that it didn’t disable an individual state’s capacity to screen its own exchange, and had no capacity to arrange exchange understandings. States, then again, could make and uphold any exchange limitation they saw fit. The main force the states needed was the capacity to make outside bargains. Be that as it may, since the focal government had so little exchange power, there was almost no monetary coordination among the states. While congress reserved the option to manage all types of American money, The Articles of Confederation never determined a particular type of cash. This implied national government could print cash, however each state could too. In this way, America had no uniform arrangement of cash which made exchange among states, and with outside substances, substantially more troublesome and less effective. Pushing ahead, the second arrangement of constraints that the Articles of Confederation needed to battle with was the nonappearance of focal authority it gave. The Articles put the force in the hands of the states, at last prompting financial difficulties and initiative shortage. The Articles of Confederation gave no arrangement of courts in the ward of the national government. Since congress had no way to uphold its laws, the states could basically ign>
America in the mid-1780’s was tormented with monetary disarray that started from congress’ powerlessness to oversee exchange. Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress had restricted capacity to manage exchange. Congress was just ready to control take with Native American clans and, and still, at the end of the day, just on the off chance that it didn’t disable an individual state’s capacity to screen its own exchange, and had no capacity to arrange exchange understandings. States, then again, could make and uphold any exchange limitation they saw fit. The main force the states needed was the capacity to make outside bargains. Be that as it may, since the focal government had so little exchange power, there was almost no monetary coordination among the states. While congress reserved the option to manage all types of American money, The Articles of Confederation never determined a particular type of cash. This implied national government could print cash, however each state could too. In this way, America had no uniform arrangement of cash which made exchange among states, and with outside substances, substantially more troublesome and less effective. Pushing ahead, the second arrangement of constraints that the Articles of Confederation needed to battle with was the nonappearance of focal authority it gave. The Articles put the force in the hands of the states, at last prompting financial difficulties and initiative shortage. The Articles of Confederation gave no arrangement of courts in the ward of the national government. Since congress had no way to uphold its laws, the states could basically ign>
