Below you will find a small selection of theoretical questions relating to the course. Any of these questions
can be turned into a paper topic, especially for Paper 1.
- What is the relative importance attached to (male) friendship in the society? How is the society
structured in a way that supports and encourages close bonds between men?
- What is the relationship in the society between male friendship and marriage? In what way do they
work together? In what way, for example, must marriage in the premodern societies work to reinforce
and support male friendship as the most important relationship in that society?
- Why is it that male friendship is given more importance in premodern and, to a certain extent, early
modern societies? What has made male friendship today diminished. (You might ask how our society is
structured in such a way that it encourages and promotes marriage (and the nuclear family) even as it
requires that other relationships, including friendship, bow down to this relationship.)
- Think about how human relationships differed when society was structured differently. How did male
friendship feel, and how does this feeling differ from the feeling we might have today toward our friends?
Relatedly, how did marriage feel, and how did it differ from how it felt today? Even though I keep using the
term, “diminish,” this question really should be considered in terms of the quality of the affection rather
than simply the intensity.
- In what way was friendship characterized by ritualistic behavior? In what way was it considered a
spiritual entity? How does this compare and contrast to how marriage is considered by many (but not all)
in our society? Do we still have rituals around friendship? If so, why not? What do these rituals tell us
about the way friendship felt or what it meant?
- How do physical acts of intimacy serve to express the intimacy between men? Did earlier cultures
have the same homophobia — that is, fear that certain behavior or actions in their relationship would
signify as an inappropriate relationship? Without such homophobia (or awareness of something called
“homosexuality”), how are male friendships constructed differently?
Sample Solution
Mill operator, and Achterberg (2000) built a various decision survey to asses the sustenance and nourishment name information among ladies with sort 2 diabetes mellitus who matured from 40 to 60 years. The inquiries were set from the simpler to the hard to encourage certainty among the members. The inquiries that measure the accurate learning were set in the first place pursued by the more troublesome inquiries (procedural information). The test was intended to be finished inside 30 to 40 minutes by generally respondents. The unwavering quality of the test was observed to be 0.80 dependent on Kuder-Richardson recipe 20(K-R 20). After this the thing examination of the first information test was finished. Three inquiries were erased from the test as a result of high record of trouble (two inquiries) and thing separation of just 0.20.The thing investigation for the modified adaptation of the test was done and the dependability of the test was observed to be 0.81 utilizing the Kuder-Richardson recipe 20 (K-R 20) equation. The updated test was directed to 43 ladies Al Shafaee et al (2008) built up a survey to comprehend the Knowledge and impression of diabetes in a semi-urban Omani populace. 563 grown-up occupants of Omani town were talked with utilizing the survey. The last review instrument contained 24 things which were subdivided into 5 areas. The initial two segments secured the socioeconomics and medicinal history of the members. The third segment was for the diabetic members. It secured their diabetic history and glycemic control status. The fourth segment included learning with respect to the diabetes definition, signs and side effects, chance variables and difficulties. The last segment concentrated on the network mindfulness, the member’s observation with respect to diabetes commonness, saw danger of creating diabetes and counteractive action. Likert-type reaction scale was utilized in the survey. To gather information that were generally absurd with a run of the mill Likert scale, open-finished inquiries were incorporated which pursued a shut finished inquiry. The poll was pre-tried and guided inside a comfort test of understudies and staff at the College. Considerable between coding understanding for the scale things was watched (r = 0.86, p
Mill operator, and Achterberg (2000) built a various decision survey to asses the sustenance and nourishment name information among ladies with sort 2 diabetes mellitus who matured from 40 to 60 years. The inquiries were set from the simpler to the hard to encourage certainty among the members. The inquiries that measure the accurate learning were set in the first place pursued by the more troublesome inquiries (procedural information). The test was intended to be finished inside 30 to 40 minutes by generally respondents. The unwavering quality of the test was observed to be 0.80 dependent on Kuder-Richardson recipe 20(K-R 20). After this the thing examination of the first information test was finished. Three inquiries were erased from the test as a result of high record of trouble (two inquiries) and thing separation of just 0.20.The thing investigation for the modified adaptation of the test was done and the dependability of the test was observed to be 0.81 utilizing the Kuder-Richardson recipe 20 (K-R 20) equation. The updated test was directed to 43 ladies Al Shafaee et al (2008) built up a survey to comprehend the Knowledge and impression of diabetes in a semi-urban Omani populace. 563 grown-up occupants of Omani town were talked with utilizing the survey. The last review instrument contained 24 things which were subdivided into 5 areas. The initial two segments secured the socioeconomics and medicinal history of the members. The third segment was for the diabetic members. It secured their diabetic history and glycemic control status. The fourth segment included learning with respect to the diabetes definition, signs and side effects, chance variables and difficulties. The last segment concentrated on the network mindfulness, the member’s observation with respect to diabetes commonness, saw danger of creating diabetes and counteractive action. Likert-type reaction scale was utilized in the survey. To gather information that were generally absurd with a run of the mill Likert scale, open-finished inquiries were incorporated which pursued a shut finished inquiry. The poll was pre-tried and guided inside a comfort test of understudies and staff at the College. Considerable between coding understanding for the scale things was watched (r = 0.86, p
