In collaboration with the approved course preceptor, students will identify a specific evidence-based topic for the capstone project change proposal. Students should consider the clinical environment in which they are currently employed or have recently worked. The capstone project topic can be a clinical practice problem, an organizational issue, a leadership or quality improvement initiative, or an unmet educational need specific to a patient population or community. The student may also choose to work with an interprofessional collaborative team.
Students should select a topic that aligns to their area of interest as well as the clinical practice setting in which practice hours are completed.
Write a 500-750 word description of your proposed capstone project topic. Include the following:
The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal.
The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed.
A description (providing a high level of detail) regarding the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project.
Effect of the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project.
Significance of the topic and its implications for nursing practice.
Sample Solution
human rights. Conversely, Simmons found differences in states that are neither repressive nor completely democratic and was able to see a difference in states that did ratify CAT. However, establishing types of regimes is necessary when observing state behaviour of human rights as some states may not be able to progress as they have always been compliant to human rights, whereas other states the complete opposite. Political science then provides evidence that helps establish which states are likely to comply with human rights and which states are not. Furthermore, Risse, Ropp and Sikkinkâs five-stages âspiral modelâ addresses the processes whereby countries transition from a denial of human rights abuses to gradual compliance. The use of transnational actors such as NGOs has often helped states move from repressive regimes to compliant human rights advocates e.g. Tunisia. The spiral model was able to provide for a useful framework in how states are able to progress from non-compliant to cooperative. However, Jetschke and Liese and Landman argue that the spiral model overestimates CSOs and fails to consider how some powerful states such as China are able to use their economic power to undermine human rights. The model also does not allow for other possible paths some states may take and thus fails to acknowledge other disciplines such as history as some states oblige due to historical compliance. Though these criticisms are convincing, the spiral model does provide for a basic framework in which political science can use to further improve its approach to human rights. Lastly, human security has provided individuals certainty of their protection when states may ignore citizens lives. A narrower view of human security allows better protection for individuals as it includes not only individual threats but threats that are not directly human righ>
human rights. Conversely, Simmons found differences in states that are neither repressive nor completely democratic and was able to see a difference in states that did ratify CAT. However, establishing types of regimes is necessary when observing state behaviour of human rights as some states may not be able to progress as they have always been compliant to human rights, whereas other states the complete opposite. Political science then provides evidence that helps establish which states are likely to comply with human rights and which states are not. Furthermore, Risse, Ropp and Sikkinkâs five-stages âspiral modelâ addresses the processes whereby countries transition from a denial of human rights abuses to gradual compliance. The use of transnational actors such as NGOs has often helped states move from repressive regimes to compliant human rights advocates e.g. Tunisia. The spiral model was able to provide for a useful framework in how states are able to progress from non-compliant to cooperative. However, Jetschke and Liese and Landman argue that the spiral model overestimates CSOs and fails to consider how some powerful states such as China are able to use their economic power to undermine human rights. The model also does not allow for other possible paths some states may take and thus fails to acknowledge other disciplines such as history as some states oblige due to historical compliance. Though these criticisms are convincing, the spiral model does provide for a basic framework in which political science can use to further improve its approach to human rights. Lastly, human security has provided individuals certainty of their protection when states may ignore citizens lives. A narrower view of human security allows better protection for individuals as it includes not only individual threats but threats that are not directly human righ>
