In my dissertation I dealt with the subject of body modifications, I centered on the two that are the most commonplace in current society – piercing and tattoos. so as to research this phenomenon and the enlargement of these changes nowadays, I decided to consciousness on population that has non-public enjoy in changes, i.e Fiscal and Monetary Policy Analysis . respondents who very own as a minimum one frame modification themselves. The result of this quantitative research is a preview of the cutting-edge scenario, which, primarily based at the research consequences, could be very one of a kind from the findings of the theoretical part of this paintings. The aim of the studies changed into to locate solutions to the question of whether or not a tattoo has a deeper which means than simply frame sculpting and why this irreversible modification these days turns into a depend of favor and is owned and commonplace by an increasing number of individuals, when in the past, modifications were condemned. It does no longer appear that there Fiscal and Monetary Policy Analysis  is a unmarried solution for all modified individuals. The end result is that about a quarter of the modified people have tattoos in basic terms for aesthetic reasons. some other nearly 3 quarters of the respondents have deeper motives, which include, specifical Fiscal and Monetary Policy Analysis ly, expressing their mind, opinions and attitudes or communicating a period of life, for example, a few hard lifestyles conditions. however, ironically, approximately sixty five% of the respondents are of the opinion that the opposite modified individuals have their tattoos purely for aesthetic and fashionable motives (detected by means of adding up opinions “it’s contemporary and brand new” 42.eight% and “aesthetic reasons” 17.6% of respondents). It also follows that tattoos are no longer condemned as a good deal as ever before due to the fact they’ve turn out to be a fashion trend and this is probably the motive of the ever-increasing hobby in this alteration, although maximum respondents deny that they’ve a tattoo handiest for superficial motives and spot a deeper feel in their tattoos than in tattoos of other people. individuals consequently feel excellent, seeing experience of their tattoos, whilst according to them, the others have simply succumbed to the style trend. This wellknown characteristic might be resulting from the reality that most people have the so-known as “double meter,” they study themselves differently than at the others and refuse to admit that they might give up to fashion traits  Fiscal and Monetary Policy Analysis or pressure from society. The best differences among the respondents are logically discovered in gender breakdowns, which again confirms the idea mentioned within the theoretical element that men have their tattoos extra wonderful, larger and more seen because they ought to emphasize their masculinity and women prefer a more subtle, respectable and much less visible designs. girls at the beginning gave birth to kids and guarded the circle of relatives home whilst men had a totally one-of-a-kind chall Fiscal and Monetary Policy Analysisenge – they were hunters, protectors and breadwinners. ladies used to beautify themselves because they desired their men to love them, whilst the guys embellished themselves to electrify the enemies. (Fiksa, 2005) for this reason, girls did not have sizeable tattoos in seen locations so that they did no longer frighten their youngsters, unlike the guys whose tattoos intimidated the enemy. The piercing is mainly popular across ladies, majority of whom have it for pu>