From where I stand, the test is an invalid judgment of intelligence because intelligence isn’t really required to past the test. Despite the fact that the system can pass for a human it still doesn’t display any conscious experience that a person obtains. In other words, the awareness of our own mental process, feelings and sensations. “When we say robots have emotion, we don’t mean they feel happy or sad or have mental states. This is shorthand for, they seem to exhibit behavior that we humans interpret as such and such” (https://medium.com). By that quote, my interpretation would be if we receive a brand new gift, we achieve a level of joy and sensation that a mere computer could never understand. Thus, we are without doubt the only beings that acquire this type of self-awareness and high level of consciousness. Another prime example would be ethical issues if people were to rely solely on computers. “When a driverless car runs over someone’s pet, or worse, another human being should we then act as if it knew what it was doing? Should we be granting citizenship to robots that only pretend to know what it means to be a citizen” (https://becominghuman.ai). From this I take that, imitation systems will nonetheless be unethical because they portray an identity about themselves that does not reflect the whole truth of reality. To conclude, I think a computer could very much knowledgeable in terms of sources. The basic computer holds a lot of information, but the information that we fed them. All that information came from a person, all thoughts were formulated by a person. Would I use the word intelligent? No, until the computer could display emotions and codify thoughts on it’s own, my answer will be no.>