The idea of ordering a time of ancient times as the Iron Age was first presented in the nineteenth century, and later approved by the hugely huge disclosures at Hallstatt and La Tène. Therefore, the time was separated into sequential periods, against which the British Iron Age is currently characterized. For simplicity of definition, The British Iron Age will in general be broken into three periods, Early, Middle and Late, crossing approximately 1000 years, from 800 BC to the second century AD, and is so named attributable to the disclosure and improvement of iron taking predominance over the u Ethnic Diversity and Health tilization of bronze. The term Celtic, having gone into the vernacular, is presently simply an unclear conventional term. The conventional view was that Iron Age Britons were a piece of an immense Celtic Commonwealth which at that point extended crosswise over Europe, a universe of people groups who talked related dialects, and who shared an unmistakable arrangement of qualities, social organizations, otherworldliness, workmanship and different parts of life and culture. (James 1997, 2). This is currently recognized to be a mons Ethnic Diversity and Health trous distortion, a romanticized idea conceived of hypotheses set forward by eighteenth century researchers, in view of established Latin and Greek sources. Edward Lhuyd suggested that Welsh, Scottish and Irish dialects all originate from the antiquated Gaulish. The mark Celtic was then transposed from the dialects to the general population themselves, scenes, and their apparent culture and workmanship. Truly and archeologically, this word is unhelpful and uninformative. To be sure, Simon James has proposed that calling the Iron Age Celtic is misleading to the point that it is best relinquished. (James S. 01.06.98) As the term Celtic is for all intents and purposes inane, with the end goal of this piece we will explore to what degree the indigenous populace of Britain were affected by their mainland partners. It was felt that the Iron Age Britons (involving various and frequently warring clans and were not the slightest bit bound together) were liable to various Belgic attacks amid the Iron Age. A portion of the proof for this model originates from Caesar, who expresses that preceding his very own campaigns of 55 and 54 B.C., the number of inhabitants in the beach front areas of south-eastern Britain had themselves moved from Belgic Gaul, first looking for loot, and consequently so as to settle for all time. He additionally detailed that in his very own lifetime, Diviciacus had been not just the most dominant ruler in all Gaul, however had likewise practiced sway in Britain. (D.W. Harding 1974, 2 Ethnic Diversity and Health 01) There is archeological proof which has been utilized to help this model. The disclosure of the Battersea shield in 1857, a complicatedly enriched piece, is like a bronze shield found in the waterway Witham in Lincolnshire. Both are comparable in structure to curios found at La Tène. These finds, joined with graveyard locales in Aylesford, Welwyn and East Yorkshire, which bore close connection to Gaulish internment ceremonies, were taken as checking the hypothesis of intrusion as the foremost, even sole, reason for change in ancient Britain. (James 1997, 12)>