We can work on Driving forces behind chronic disease management programs

complete a presentation analyzing key goals of chronic disease management, stakeholders, and approaches to care.
You are focusing on the processes and NOT managing a specific chronic disease such as heart disease.
Chronic diseases–such as heart disease, cancer, and diabetes–are placing a growing burden on the U.S. health care system. In response, some health care organizations are instituting chronic disease management (CDM) programs to reduce the incidence of preventable hospitalizations and adverse events by more effectively and comprehensively managing the health of patients with chronic conditions. Many of these organizations are implementing health information technology (health IT) to facilitate their chronic disease management programs.Chronic disease management health IT applications may enable the re-distribution of patient management tasks to non-physician personnel. Many health IT solutions for chronic disease management are intended primarily for physician use. However, these systems also can be designed to engage other key members of the health care team in decision-making, such as nurses, case managers and other key healthcare professionals. Use the following information to create a PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes. Include the following information in your final presentation:

Identify and explain the key goals of chronic disease management
What are the driving forces behind chronic disease management programs?
Explain the roles of health care team members in the management of chronic diseases?
Include internal clinical and non-clinical roles.
Compare and contrast two models of chronic disease management and address their approach to:
Self-management support
Delivery system design
Decision support
Clinical information systems
Organization of health care
Community
Analyze the financial impact of a chronic disease management program.
For this assignment, you will complete a presentation analyzing key goals of chronic disease management, stakeholders, and approaches to care.

You are looking at the process and not a particular disease.
Your assignment should not reflect the steps from managing a chronic disease such as heart disease. Focus on the process.
Include the following information in your presentation:

Title Slide
Follow APA 7th edition guidelines on the development of your title slide
Introduction
Introduce what the purpose of this presentation is, you can rephrase the assignment.
Identify and explain the key goals of chronic disease management.
List, briefly, the goals on the slide and then in the speaker’s notes define them how the goals interact with each other. The focus is on chronic disease management models and not a specific condition.
Explain what the driving forces behind chronic disease management programs.
List at least 3 driving forces
Why is there an emphasis on chronic disease management programs? Why do they exist?
Explain the roles of health care team members in the management of chronic diseases, including clinical and non-clinical roles.
There should be at least five health care team member groups identified and described.
Who are the players and what specific role do they have?
Compare and contrast two models of chronic disease management and address their approach to the six essential elements of a chronic care model (in other words for each of the two models you must describe the six essential elements below). How are the two models similar? How are the two models different?
Self-management support
Delivery system design
Decision support
Clinical information systems
Organization of health care
Community
Examples of chronic disease models include (pick two to complete number 6):

Chronic Care model (CCM)
Stanford model (SM)
Community based Transition Model (CBTM)
Improving Chronic Illness Care (ICIC)
Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions (ICCC)
Analyze the financial impact of a chronic disease management program.
Provide content that evidences at least three points of financial impact from chronic disease management programs as a whole.
What is the economic value of these models?

Sample Solution

find the cost of your paper
facebookShare on Facebook

TwitterTweet

FollowFollow us

At long last, the most dubious condition is that wars ought to have a sensible likelihood of coming out on top. As Vittola repeated, the point of war is to lay out harmony and security; getting the public great. On the off chance that this can’t be accomplished, Frowe contends it would be smarter to give up to the foe. This can be legitimate in light of the fact that the expenses of war would have been greater (Frowe (2011), Page 56-7). Therefore, jus promotion bellum contains a few circumstances yet in particular: noble motivation and proportionality. This gives individuals an aide regardless of whether entering a war is legitimate. Be that as it may, this is just a single piece of the hypothesis of the simply war. In any case, it very well may be seen over that jus promotion bellum can be bantered all through, showing that there is no conclusive hypothesis of a simply battle, as it is normatively estimated. Jus in bello The subsequent segment starts translating jus in bello or what activities might we at any point group as reasonable in wars (Begby et al (2006b), Page 323). To begin with, it is never to kill blameless individuals in wars, upheld by Vittola’s most memorable recommendation purposefully. This is broadly acknowledged as ‘all individuals have a right not to be killed’ and assuming a warrior does, they have disregarded that right and lost their right. This is additionally upheld by “non-soldier resistance” (Frowe (2011), Page 151), which prompts the topic of warrior capability referenced later in the paper. This is certified by the bombarding of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, finishing WWII, where millions were eagerly killed, just to get the point of war. In any case, now and again regular citizens are unintentionally killed through battles to accomplish their objective of harmony and security. This is upheld by Vittola, who infers proportionality again to legitimize activity: ‘care should be taken where evil doesn’t offset the potential advantages (Begby et al (2006b), Page 325).’ This is additionally upheld by Frowe who makes sense of it is legitimate to inadvertently kill, at whatever point the warrior has full information on his activities and tries to finish his point, however it would include some significant downfalls. Be that as it may, this doesn’t conceal the reality the accidental actually killed blameless individuals, showing shamelessness in their activities. Hence, it relies again upon proportionality as Thomson contends (Frowe (2011), Page 141). This prompts question of what meets all requirements to be a soldier, and whether it is legitimate to kill each other as warriors. Soldiers are individuals who are involved straightforwardly or by implication with the conflict and it is legitimate to kill ‘to protect the blameless from hurt… rebuff scalawags (Begby et al (2006b), Page 290).However, as referenced above regular citizen can’t be hurt, showing warriors as the main genuine focuses on, one more state of jus in bello, as ‘we may not utilize the sword against the people who have not hurt us (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314).’ likewise, Frowe recommended warriors should be recognized as warriors, to keep away from the presence of hit and run combat which can wind up in a higher demise count, for instance, the Vietnam War. Additionally, he contended they should be important for the military, remain battle ready and apply to the guidelines of jus in bello. (Frowe (2011), Page 101-3). This recommends Frowe looks for a fair, simply battle between two members keeping away from non-soldier passings, however couldn’t this prompt higher demise rate for warriors, as the two sides have generally equivalent opportunity to win since both utilize comparative strategies? By and by, apparently Frowe will contend that warrior can legitimately>

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples