In the US, federalism is a characteristic of our form of government that shares governmental powers between
the federal government and the 50 state governments. The US Constitution distributes certain of those powers
to the federal government, but reserves the remaining governmental powers (per the US Constitution’s 10th
amendment) to the states.
Over the Nationâs two centuries of existence there has been much controversy about what governmental
powers should be exercised by the two levels of government. Currently, much controversy centers on whether
or not the federal government and state governments encroached upon or are encroaching upon individual
rights and liberties in response to the Coronavirus.
Start your research by reading the US Constitutionâs Article I, Section 8, Article I, Section 10, and its 10th
Amendment (as well as the rest of the Constitution and other sources). Also, read the Texas Constitutionâs
relevant provisions as well as Texas Government Code, Chapter 418. That Chapter empowers the Texas
Governor to issue orders to protect Texas residents in situations where the publicâs welfare is threatened. One
of the things that you should note is that the restrictions placed upon all of us are, for the most part, a functionof state governments and not the Federal government.
Despite the fact that the aforementioned restrictions only emerged a few months ago, there is already a
plethora of information available about and commentary on the necessity or propriety of those restrictions,
governmentâs role, and threats to liberty. You may consider that governments have and are acting appropriately
in response to the virus; on the other hand, you may find that they are not, that the restrictions are unnecessary
or too onerous.
Either way, you are to compose a paper that addresses those governmental actions. To prompt your thinking,
here are some things to consider:
What is the issue?
Briefly describe this issue
What is the controversy?
What are the differences between advocates and opponents of it?
How does the issue affect individuals, economics, and society in general?
What do you think is the primary role of government in such a situation as this? Why?
What should be the role of each level of government?
What do the US and Texas Constitutions say about it?
What is the history of governmentsâ actions in similar situations?
Are governments doing enough or too little or too much?
Should primary responses to the virus be by the federal government or by state governments?
As of this writing, the US Congress has already made available or is considering making available over $6
trillion in aid to governments, businesses, and individuals in response to the virus. Is that appropriate?
Sample Solution
calculus removal was between the three test instruments: the amount of lost tooth substance, and the root surface roughness resulting from the instruments used within the study. The three test instrument types were a hand curette, an ultrasonic instrument, and a rotary bur. SEM examined Thirty-six extracted mandibular incisors. The basis of the measurements is the remaining calculus index (RCI), The loss of tooth substance index (LTSI), and the roughness loss of tooth substance index (RLTSI). Each instrument treated twelve of the thirty-six samples. The time required for the completion of each instrumentation treatment was also noted â the use of the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA method for multiple group comparisons and the Mann-Whitney test for group-wise comparisons aided in the statistical analysis of the data. The analysis was carried out with SPSS® software (version 13). Data for the study The effect of various ultrasonic and hand instruments on the root surfaces of human single-rooted teeth: A Planimetric and Profilometric study (Antush M., Ashish S. N., Ranganath V, Vuppalapati R., 2014) utilized 40 single-rooted teeth with subgingival calculus destined for extraction. Assignment of each tooth went to one of three experimental groups and one control group. Each group had a sample size of 10 teeth, and the control group was left untreated. Group one treated the teeth with the Piezoelectric ultrasonic. Group two treated their sample teeth with the Magnetostrictive ultrasonic. Also, group three had treatment with hand instrumentation (Curette). After instrumentation, and extraction of the treated teeth the presence of residual deposits and root surface roughness were analyzed using the Planimetric analyzing tool and Surface Profilometer. Root surface was evaluated qualitatively using SEM. Data for the study Root Surface Roughness After Scaling and Root Planing with Er:YA>
calculus removal was between the three test instruments: the amount of lost tooth substance, and the root surface roughness resulting from the instruments used within the study. The three test instrument types were a hand curette, an ultrasonic instrument, and a rotary bur. SEM examined Thirty-six extracted mandibular incisors. The basis of the measurements is the remaining calculus index (RCI), The loss of tooth substance index (LTSI), and the roughness loss of tooth substance index (RLTSI). Each instrument treated twelve of the thirty-six samples. The time required for the completion of each instrumentation treatment was also noted â the use of the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA method for multiple group comparisons and the Mann-Whitney test for group-wise comparisons aided in the statistical analysis of the data. The analysis was carried out with SPSS® software (version 13). Data for the study The effect of various ultrasonic and hand instruments on the root surfaces of human single-rooted teeth: A Planimetric and Profilometric study (Antush M., Ashish S. N., Ranganath V, Vuppalapati R., 2014) utilized 40 single-rooted teeth with subgingival calculus destined for extraction. Assignment of each tooth went to one of three experimental groups and one control group. Each group had a sample size of 10 teeth, and the control group was left untreated. Group one treated the teeth with the Piezoelectric ultrasonic. Group two treated their sample teeth with the Magnetostrictive ultrasonic. Also, group three had treatment with hand instrumentation (Curette). After instrumentation, and extraction of the treated teeth the presence of residual deposits and root surface roughness were analyzed using the Planimetric analyzing tool and Surface Profilometer. Root surface was evaluated qualitatively using SEM. Data for the study Root Surface Roughness After Scaling and Root Planing with Er:YA>