Write My Essay We are the most trusted essay writing service. Get the best essays delivered by experienced UK & US essay writers at affordable prices.
We can work on Compare/Contrast Two State Government IT Security Policies
Briefly describe two CBT and two IPT evidenced-based practice strategies that may be applied to working with crisis survivors. Then explain how these strategies might be changed if the crisis survivor was diagnosed with PTSD prior to the current trauma. Finally, provide a brief analysis of how your intervention strategies for persons with PTSD might differ if you were working with military personnel rather than civilians. Give specific examples.” 269 https://www.homeworkmarket.com/homework-answers?page=269 1600079978-1349 https://www.homeworkmarket.com/homework-answers?page=263 week4 https://www.homeworkmarket.com/questions/week4-19743207 “Separation of Duties Discuss the importance of separation of duties for personnel. Describe the reasons why separation of duties is a critical requirement for policy framework compliance. Discuss examples of roles you would separate and why. For example, an administrator has full administrative server login access, and a network technician has limited administrative access but can view system login details. Payroll has access to employee financial records, but only payroll managers can approve raises. Describe your methodology for creating a security policy. Explain your answers.” 271 https://www.homeworkmarket.com/homework-answers?page=271 Compare/Contrast Two State Government IT Security Policies https://www.homeworkmarket.com/questions/comparecontrast-two-state-government-it-security-policies “Compare/Contrast Two State Government IT Security Policies
Sample Solution
The limitations of participant observation are fairly similar to those of the in-depth interview. There is the risk of bias, where the researcher may sympathise with the group and understand their point of view having spent more time with them. Additionally, participant observation can be very time consuming. This is made even more difficult if the researcher is conducting the research covertly. It takes time to build up a rapport with the group and can be very stressful to be under that amount of pressure for a significant amount of time. There is also an issue of ethics with the covert participant observation method, where the group being researched in unaware that they are being researched. It raises issues about ethics behind deceiving people to study them or obtain information on them. It is heightened if the researcher must participate in any illegal or immoral activity, even if it is for research purposes. Furthermore, in addition to it being challenging with in-depth interviews to form a general opinion of the data, participant observation makes that a challenge too. The sample sizes with participant observation are quite often small groups, and thus is difficult to generalise. It is also nearly impossible to repeat a participant observation research study, given it is entirely dependent on how the researcher decides to interact with the group. This limitation gives the method a sense of unreliability, as there is no real way to verify its validity with any other group. It has also been argued that participant observation is not a truthful representation of data attained from a sample group. It has been criticised for its lack of objectivity because it can be challenging for a researcher to remain subjective when forming opinions and avoid bias. This also runs in conjunction with what data the researcher thinks is relevant and worth analysing further, giving the researcher full independence to omit any information he believes is not worth noting. The concept called the âHawthorne Effectâ which stipulates that people act differently when they know they are being observed is another drawback to participant observation if it is not being conducted covertly. There is a threat to the validity or authenticity of the study should the researcher draw an influenced conclusion to the study. As a whole, pa>
Share on Facebook
Tweet
Follow us
Share
Share
Share
Share
Share
The limitations of participant observation are fairly similar to those of the in-depth interview. There is the risk of bias, where the researcher may sympathise with the group and understand their point of view having spent more time with them. Additionally, participant observation can be very time consuming. This is made even more difficult if the researcher is conducting the research covertly. It takes time to build up a rapport with the group and can be very stressful to be under that amount of pressure for a significant amount of time. There is also an issue of ethics with the covert participant observation method, where the group being researched in unaware that they are being researched. It raises issues about ethics behind deceiving people to study them or obtain information on them. It is heightened if the researcher must participate in any illegal or immoral activity, even if it is for research purposes. Furthermore, in addition to it being challenging with in-depth interviews to form a general opinion of the data, participant observation makes that a challenge too. The sample sizes with participant observation are quite often small groups, and thus is difficult to generalise. It is also nearly impossible to repeat a participant observation research study, given it is entirely dependent on how the researcher decides to interact with the group. This limitation gives the method a sense of unreliability, as there is no real way to verify its validity with any other group. It has also been argued that participant observation is not a truthful representation of data attained from a sample group. It has been criticised for its lack of objectivity because it can be challenging for a researcher to remain subjective when forming opinions and avoid bias. This also runs in conjunction with what data the researcher thinks is relevant and worth analysing further, giving the researcher full independence to omit any information he believes is not worth noting. The concept called the âHawthorne Effectâ which stipulates that people act differently when they know they are being observed is another drawback to participant observation if it is not being conducted covertly. There is a threat to the validity or authenticity of the study should the researcher draw an influenced conclusion to the study. As a whole, pa>
Is this question part of your Assignment?
We can help
Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.
We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals
