We can work on Communicating With Others

Prompt
Although we would like to think that we always communicate effectively with those around us, the reality is that often the things we say, the way we say them, and the nonverbal cues we give end up creating communication barriers with others. Sometimes this results in a communication breakdown. In this journal, you will recall a communication error that you committed in a professional or work setting. Focus your journal on the things you said, the way you said them, and the nonverbal cues you gave that ended up creating a situation that did not go at all like you intended.
Identify a situation in which your communication style/approach caused a breakdown in communication with another person.
Briefly describe the situation. Feel free to change names or other identifying information for privacy purposes.
Describe how your verbal communication created a barrier between you and the other person.
What did you say (intentionally or unintentionally) that may have offended or upset the other person?
Describe how your nonverbal communication created a barrier between you and the other person.
What nonverbal cues did you display (intentionally or unintentionally) that may have offended or upset the other person?
Describe what you would have changed to improve the communication between you and the other person.
How could you have changed your verbal or nonverbal communication to better communicate with the other person?
What verbal or nonverbal communications from the other person did you miss or ignore that you wish you had reacted to?
What was the impact of your communication style in this circumstance?

Sample Solution

find the cost of your paper
facebookShare on Facebook

TwitterTweet

FollowFollow us

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi>

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples