Economic growth has to consider environmental sustainability â otherwise we are compromising the health and well-being of future generations and their future economic growth!
GENERAL SUSTAINABILITY DEFINITION AND PRINCIPLES
“Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It contains within it two key concepts:
the concept of needs, in particular the essential needs of the world’s poor, to which overriding priority should be given; and
the idea of limitations imposed by the state of technology and social organization on the environment’s ability to meet present and future needs.” (Bruntland 1987)
By definition, this requires citizens who wish to act sustainably to engage in actions that are ecologically sound, economically feasible, and socially responsible.
KEY CONCEPTS
Sustainable multiple use management of food resources, following food from production to consumption (i.e. resource use, zero waste vs. disposal).
Environmental impacts of food production.
How food production methods affect the nutritional content of food.
Improvement of public health through good nutrition in healthy food options.
Integrated waste management through proper packaging and disposal of food.
Pollution prevention through integrated waste management practices, such as rejection, source reduction, reuse opportunities, and recycling methods.
BACKGROUND STUDY
Watch this youtube video: Food Justice, A Growing Movement (6 minutes)
Ecological Footprint Quiz (5 minutes): Go to a website that provides the ecological footprint quiz for free. Complete the quiz to find out your footprint, or how many Earths would be needed to support your living habits. When finished, click the orange button, âReduce your Footprint,â and read some strategies to reduce your personal global footprint. https://www.footprintcalculator.org/
Sample Solution
The tools they employ to manage client portfolios differ little from the portfolio management software already widely used in the profession. The main difference is in distribution channel. Until recently, portfolio management was almost exclusively conducted through human advisors and sold in a bundle with other services. Now, consumers can access the portfolio management tools directly, in the same way that they have obtained access to brokerage houses like Charles Schwab and stock trading services with the advent of the Internet. Roboadvisors are extending into new business avenues. The customer acquisition costs and time constraints faced by traditional human advisors have left many middle-class investors who are underadvised to get a better advice to invest in the portfolio with help of the robo advisors easily. The average financial planner has a minimum investment amount of $50,000,while minimum investment amounts for robo-advisors start as low as $500 in the United States and as low as £1 in the United Kingdom. In addition to having lower minimums on investable assets compared to traditional human advisors, robo-advisors charge fees ranging from 0.2% to 1.0% of Assets Under Management while traditional financial planners charged average fees of 1.35% of Assets Under Management according to a survey conducted by AdvisoryHQ News. In the United States, robo-advisors should be registered investment advisors, which are regulated be Security and Exchange Commission (SEC). In the United Kingdom they are regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Assets Managed under Robo Advisors: As of October 2017, robo-advisors had $224 billion in assets under management. The following are the largest robo-advisors by assets under management: Company Country AUM (millions of US$)>
The tools they employ to manage client portfolios differ little from the portfolio management software already widely used in the profession. The main difference is in distribution channel. Until recently, portfolio management was almost exclusively conducted through human advisors and sold in a bundle with other services. Now, consumers can access the portfolio management tools directly, in the same way that they have obtained access to brokerage houses like Charles Schwab and stock trading services with the advent of the Internet. Roboadvisors are extending into new business avenues. The customer acquisition costs and time constraints faced by traditional human advisors have left many middle-class investors who are underadvised to get a better advice to invest in the portfolio with help of the robo advisors easily. The average financial planner has a minimum investment amount of $50,000,while minimum investment amounts for robo-advisors start as low as $500 in the United States and as low as £1 in the United Kingdom. In addition to having lower minimums on investable assets compared to traditional human advisors, robo-advisors charge fees ranging from 0.2% to 1.0% of Assets Under Management while traditional financial planners charged average fees of 1.35% of Assets Under Management according to a survey conducted by AdvisoryHQ News. In the United States, robo-advisors should be registered investment advisors, which are regulated be Security and Exchange Commission (SEC). In the United Kingdom they are regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Assets Managed under Robo Advisors: As of October 2017, robo-advisors had $224 billion in assets under management. The following are the largest robo-advisors by assets under management: Company Country AUM (millions of US$)>
