We can work on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality”

Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” and the required topic Resources, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions:

  1. What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with? How is this related to the intrinsic human value and dignity?
  2. Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? What from the case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected?
  3. How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action?
  4. What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?
    Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.
    While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center
    Case Study: Fetal Abnormality
    Jessica is a 30-year-old immigrant from Mexico City. She and her husband Marco have been in the United States for the last three years and have finally earned enough money to move out of their Aunt Maria’s home and into an apartment of their own. They are both hard workers. Jessica works 50 hours a week at a local restaurant and Marco has been contracting side jobs in construction. Six months before their move to an apartment, Jessica finds out she is pregnant.
    Four months later, Jessica and Marco arrive at the county hospital, a large, public, nonteaching hospital. A preliminary ultrasound indicates a possible abnormality with the fetus. Further scans are conducted, and it is determined that the fetus has a rare condition in which it has not developed any arms and will not likely develop them. There is also a 25% chance that the fetus may have Down syndrome.
    Dr. Wilson, the primary attending physician, is seeing Jessica for the first time, since she and Marco did not receive earlier prenatal care over concerns about finances. Marco insists that Dr. Wilson refrain from telling Jessica the scan results, assuring him that he will tell his wife himself when she is emotionally ready for the news. While Marco and Dr. Wilson are talking in another room, Aunt Maria walks into the room with a distressed look on her face. She can tell that something is wrong and inquires of Dr. Wilson. After hearing of the diagnosis, she walks out of the room wailing loudly and praying aloud.
    Marco and Dr. Wilson continue their discussion, and Dr. Wilson insists that he has an obligation to Jessica as his patient and that she has a right to know the diagnosis of the fetus. He furthermore is intent on discussing all relevant factors and options regarding the next step, including abortion. Marco insists on taking some time to think of how to break the news to Jessica, but Dr. Wilson, frustrated with the direction of the conversation, informs the husband that such a choice is not his to make. Dr. Wilson proceeds back across the hall, where he walks in on Aunt Maria awkwardly praying with Jessica and phoning the priest. At that point, Dr. Wilson gently but briefly informs Jessica of the diagnosis and lays out the option for abortion as a responsible medical alternative, given the quality of life such a child would have. Jessica looks at him and struggles to hold back her tears.
    Jessica is torn between her hopes of a better socioeconomic position and increased independence, along with her conviction that all life is sacred. Marco will support Jessica in whatever decision she makes but is finding it difficult not to view the pregnancy and the prospects of a disabled child as a burden and a barrier to their economic security and plans. Dr. Wilson lays out all of the options but clearly makes his view known that abortion is “scientifically” and medically a wise choice in this situation. Aunt Maria pleads with Jessica to follow through with the pregnancy and allow what “God intends” to take place and urges Jessica to think of her responsibility as a mother.

Sample Solution

find the cost of your paper
facebookShare on Facebook

TwitterTweet

FollowFollow us

Association Name: Froth for Care UK (a division of Recticel Restricted [owned by Recticel SA]) Kind of Association: The organization is an individual from the Recticel Gathering, which coordinates its overall exercises into four business lines. Froth for Care UK falls under the Adaptable Froth business line, which produces polyurethane froth and related items for homegrown, modern and clinical applications. Size of Association: Recticel SA has a sum of 98 creation units in 28 nations across EMEA, Asia-Pacific and North America with around 6,000 representatives. The association accomplished a yearly turnover of €1.46 billion. Froth for Care UK has 15 staff individuals across deals, item improvement and item gathering, with a yearly turnover of £2 million out of 2017. This adds to Recticel Restricted’s yearly turnover of £134 million. Items and Administrations: Froth for Care UK spends significant time in the plan and creation of expert clinical sleeping pads, pads and adornments, basically utilizing polyurethane froth. FFCUK’s item portfolio comprises of six neighborhood brands to suit a scope of medical care conditions, as well as an ‘own image’ administration – a chance for clients to demand a custom detail. Client Base: FFCUK principally benefits Business to Business clients (B2B), offering to both unique hardware producers (Oem’s) and merchants who have some expertise in medical care gear. These items are then sold on to a scope of intense and local area care conditions, like clinics, nursing homes and psychological wellness establishments. A few wholesalers likewise work and oversee NHS People group Hardware stores under permit. Contenders: Froth for Care contenders are OEM’s and merchants that up front investment clinical sleeping pads, pads and adornments, alongside the producers that supply them as well as supply straightforwardly to the end client. The really proficient contenders incorporate Invacare, Stryker and Renray. This is an incredibly cutthroat market, with multi-million pound tenders routinely being delivered by the NHS, alongside a later influx of global, minimal expense contenders. Culture and Values: Recticel’s guiding principle unequivocally impact the corporate character of the organization, and are reflected in the more modest specialty units like Froth for Care UK. The five fundamental beliefs are: we make progress toward results, we enhance to make esteem, we act with deference and respectability, we collaborate to win, and we take possession and feel responsible (Recticel, 2017). All in an effective, practical and adjusted way, Recticel plan to add esteem and accomplish consistent, productive development for its clients and investors (R>

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples