1-)Assess the companyâs current performance on the triple bottom line: Financial Performance ( Profit), knowledge/IP and talent development (People), and management of resources (Planet)
2-)Discuss its adaptability and resilience in this age of uncertainty with the help of these 3 frameworks: PESTEL, PORTERâs 5 forces, VUCA
3-)Discuss the opportunities and threats linked to (1) rising techno-nationalism (ie, the impact on your company in terms of cost, effectiveness and ability to innovate of increasing barriers and regulation by governments around equal market access to foreign firms providing strategic services such as tech, AI, communication and IP, and (2) preferences of consumers based either on nationalism or concerns for sustainability (the âbuy localâ movement)
4-)Assess the company culture of risk and innovation, using the Blonay tool to identify the firmâs imprint and preferred dimension: product/service redesign, process/technology effectiveness, customer relationship
Sample Solution
emained essentially stagnant.â[10] Evidence of this undermines the thesis that economic factors are the most significant. A second possible explanation for some non-democratic regimes outliving others is the importance of cultural and religious factors. As argued by Almond and Verba, there is a certain ââcivic cultureâ [which] is necessary for the establishment of democracy, and [â¦] this sort of culture is not easy transferable to non-Western culturesâ[15]. The widespread acceptance of state authority and obedience towards civic duties defines the nature of Western culture: for example, the âobeying [of] the laws of the country, paying the taxes levied by the government [or] serving in a jury or as a witness in courtâ[16]. Almond and Verba argue the Western âmix of parochial passivity and modern participant activismâ[17] is only compatible with certain cultures, and could be a factor fixing countries in non-democratic regimes. Some of the most likely explanations for this are likely to be historical religious influences, particularly the influence of Protestantism in the early 17th century in Western Europe. Steve Bruce argues that âProtestantism has contributed to modern democracy [by] pioneering a particularly effective combination of individualism and community spiritâ[18], and the differing cultures of historically Islamic cultures are perhaps strengthening the likelihood of non-democratic regimesâ survivals today. As explained in the view of Sayyid Qutb, âIslam is irreconcilable with the main assumptions of democratic government, and therefore Islam and democracy are incompatibleâ[11]. This view is supported by Huntington, writing that âthe nature of Islamic culture [is] inhospitable [to] democracyâ[12], since âdemocracy clashes with the Islamic notion of the sovereignty of God [and means] taking power from the hands of its usurpers and restoring it to God aloneâ[11]. In this regard, we can see ho>
emained essentially stagnant.â[10] Evidence of this undermines the thesis that economic factors are the most significant. A second possible explanation for some non-democratic regimes outliving others is the importance of cultural and religious factors. As argued by Almond and Verba, there is a certain ââcivic cultureâ [which] is necessary for the establishment of democracy, and [â¦] this sort of culture is not easy transferable to non-Western culturesâ[15]. The widespread acceptance of state authority and obedience towards civic duties defines the nature of Western culture: for example, the âobeying [of] the laws of the country, paying the taxes levied by the government [or] serving in a jury or as a witness in courtâ[16]. Almond and Verba argue the Western âmix of parochial passivity and modern participant activismâ[17] is only compatible with certain cultures, and could be a factor fixing countries in non-democratic regimes. Some of the most likely explanations for this are likely to be historical religious influences, particularly the influence of Protestantism in the early 17th century in Western Europe. Steve Bruce argues that âProtestantism has contributed to modern democracy [by] pioneering a particularly effective combination of individualism and community spiritâ[18], and the differing cultures of historically Islamic cultures are perhaps strengthening the likelihood of non-democratic regimesâ survivals today. As explained in the view of Sayyid Qutb, âIslam is irreconcilable with the main assumptions of democratic government, and therefore Islam and democracy are incompatibleâ[11]. This view is supported by Huntington, writing that âthe nature of Islamic culture [is] inhospitable [to] democracyâ[12], since âdemocracy clashes with the Islamic notion of the sovereignty of God [and means] taking power from the hands of its usurpers and restoring it to God aloneâ[11]. In this regard, we can see ho>
