Art Bouchat, an artist in Baltimore, submitted his logo design for the Baltimore Ravens professional football team, and the Ravens used a logo design that was very similar to Bouchatâs design for their team logo during the 1996â1998 seasons. Bouchat sued the Ravens for copyright infringement for using his design as their logo without his permission, and the court ruled that the Ravens had improperly used Bouchatâs design for their logo and had infringed on his copyright of that design.
The Ravens changed their logo for the 1999 season, but they started showing highlight films from their 1996â1998 seasons in their stadium, on their website, and on their television channel, and the logo that Bouchat had designed and that the Ravens had improperly used during those seasons appeared in the highlight films.
Bouchat sued the Ravens a second time, alleging that the appearance of the logo he designed in the highlight films was, again, copyright infringement.
The Ravens assert two defenses to Bouchatâs claim of copyright infringement the second time around.
- The Ravens contended that their use of the 1996â1998 logo in the highlight films was protected by the fair use doctrine. 2. Since Bouchat and the Ravens were both citizens of Baltimore, there was no commerce among the states or interstate commerce involved, so Congress had no authority to make laws that protected Bouchatâs copyright. In a two-page case study, address the questions below. 1. Is the Ravenâs use of the logo on the highlight films protected by the fair use doctrine? 2. Is the Ravenâs claim that Congress does not have the power to regulate copyright within a single state valid? As you answer these two questions about the Ravensâ use of the logo, explain how the evolution of the Commerce Clause of the Constitution of the United States affects businesses and the Ravens in particular. Also, be sure to address the categories of intellectual properties protected by the Constitution of the United States.
Sample Solution
since they have accomplished something out of line. Different variables should be thought of, for instance, Proportionality. Thirdly, Vittola contends that war ought to be stayed away from (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332) and that we ought to continue conditions strategically. This is upheld by the “final retreat” position in Frowe, where war ought not be allowed except if all actions to look for discretion comes up short (Frowe (2011), Page 62). This implies war ought not be proclaimed until one party must choose the option to pronounce battle, to safeguard its domain and freedoms, the point of war. Notwithstanding, we can likewise contend that the conflict can never be the final retreat, considering there is dependably a method for attempting to stay away from it, similar to assents or settlement, showing Vittola’s hypothesis is imperfect. Fourthly, Vittola inquiries upon whose authority can request a formal statement of war, where he infers any district can do battle, yet more critically, “the sovereign” where he has “the regular request” as indicated by Augustine, and all authority is given to him. This is additionally upheld by Aristotle’s Governmental issues ((1996), Page 28): ‘a ruler is the regular unrivaled of his subjects.’ Notwithstanding, he really does later stress to place all confidence in the sovereign is off-base and has results; a careful assessment of the reason for war is expected alongside the eagerness to arrange rival party (Begby et al (2006b), Page 312& 318). This is upheld by the activities of Hitler are considered treacherously. Additionally, in this day and age, wars are not generally battled simply by states yet additionally non-state entertainers like Al-Queda and ISIS, showing Vittola’s regularizing guarantee on power is obsolete. This is additionally upheld by Frowe’s case that the pioneer needs to address individuals’ inclinations, under real power, which joins on to the fourth condition: Public statement of war. Concurred with many, there should be an authority declaration on a formal statement of war (Frowe (2011), Page 59-60&63). At long last, the most questionable condition is that wars ought to have a sensible likelihood of coming out on top. As Vittola emphasized, the point of war is to lay out harmony and security; getting the public great. In the event that this can’t be accomplished, Frowe contends it would be smarter to give up to the adversary. This can be legitimate on the grounds that the expenses of war would have been greater (Frowe (2011), Page 56-7). Thusly, jus promotion bellum involves a few circumstances yet in particular: worthwhile motivation and proportionality. This gives individuals an aide regardless of whether entering a war is legitimate. Nonetheless, this is just a single piece of the hypothesis of the simply war. In any case, it tends to be seen over that jus promotion bellum can be bantered all through, showing that there is no conclusive hypothesis of a simply battle, as it is normatively conjectured.>
GET ANSWER
since they have accomplished something out of line. Different variables should be thought of, for instance, Proportionality. Thirdly, Vittola contends that war ought to be stayed away from (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332) and that we ought to continue conditions strategically. This is upheld by the “final retreat” position in Frowe, where war ought not be allowed except if all actions to look for discretion comes up short (Frowe (2011), Page 62). This implies war ought not be proclaimed until one party must choose the option to pronounce battle, to safeguard its domain and freedoms, the point of war. Notwithstanding, we can likewise contend that the conflict can never be the final retreat, considering there is dependably a method for attempting to stay away from it, similar to assents or settlement, showing Vittola’s hypothesis is imperfect. Fourthly, Vittola inquiries upon whose authority can request a formal statement of war, where he infers any district can do battle, yet more critically, “the sovereign” where he has “the regular request” as indicated by Augustine, and all authority is given to him. This is additionally upheld by Aristotle’s Governmental issues ((1996), Page 28): ‘a ruler is the regular unrivaled of his subjects.’ Notwithstanding, he really does later stress to place all confidence in the sovereign is off-base and has results; a careful assessment of the reason for war is expected alongside the eagerness to arrange rival party (Begby et al (2006b), Page 312& 318). This is upheld by the activities of Hitler are considered treacherously. Additionally, in this day and age, wars are not generally battled simply by states yet additionally non-state entertainers like Al-Queda and ISIS, showing Vittola’s regularizing guarantee on power is obsolete. This is additionally upheld by Frowe’s case that the pioneer needs to address individuals’ inclinations, under real power, which joins on to the fourth condition: Public statement of war. Concurred with many, there should be an authority declaration on a formal statement of war (Frowe (2011), Page 59-60&63). At long last, the most questionable condition is that wars ought to have a sensible likelihood of coming out on top. As Vittola emphasized, the point of war is to lay out harmony and security; getting the public great. In the event that this can’t be accomplished, Frowe contends it would be smarter to give up to the adversary. This can be legitimate on the grounds that the expenses of war would have been greater (Frowe (2011), Page 56-7). Thusly, jus promotion bellum involves a few circumstances yet in particular: worthwhile motivation and proportionality. This gives individuals an aide regardless of whether entering a war is legitimate. Nonetheless, this is just a single piece of the hypothesis of the simply war. In any case, it tends to be seen over that jus promotion bellum can be bantered all through, showing that there is no conclusive hypothesis of a simply battle, as it is normatively conjectured.>
Is this question part of your Assignment?
We can help
Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.
We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals
Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples