1.Provide the correct, APA formatted citation for your artifact.
2.What is the persuasive message of your artifact?
How do the visual elements participate in the persuasive message?
How do the verbal elements participate in the persuasive message?
3.Read Evans & Thomas, ch. 1 (Language of design).
Artifact Analysis A â visual design
use the artifact you have selected for your course paper. It should have strong visual and verbal elements. The artifact should have persuasive elements and should be defensible as a persuasive message. Your answers will focus on the visual components in the message and their persuasive elements even though verbal aspects will be present.
When you submit your answers, be sure to submit a copy of the artifact; if it is a video, then provide a link to it in your document.
Step 1 :
Obtain a copy of the artifact
Step 2 :
Explain each of the following terms according to the readings â remember to provide an appropriate source citation â then, identify and briefly explain how each of the following principles/elements of design is present in your communication artifact.
- Shape
- Line
- Color
- Typography
- Balance and proportion
- Hierarchy and dominance
- Proximity
Write your response and save it as a .doc, .docx, or .rtf file then upload and submit the file here as an attachment. Include your first initial and your last name as part of the file name. Please let the instructor know if you are having difficulties uploading the document, or if you have any questions.
4.Review Auer, “What does a rhetorical critic do?”.
For this assignment, use the artifact you have selected for your course paper. It should have strong visual and verbal elements. The artifact should have persuasive elements and should be defensible as a persuasive message. Your answers will focus on the visual components in the message and their persuasive elements even though verbal aspects will be present.
When you submit your answers, be sure to submit a copy of the artifact; if it is a video, then provide a link to it in your document.
Step 1 :
Obtain a copy of the artifact
Step 2:
Using the procedure described in Auer (report, analyze, judge), critically analyze the message in paragraph format (minimum of 300-350 words). .
Sample Solution
credited to a conservative opinion that economic stability during the post-war era was quite higher than in the pre-1914 era, which was depicted by the Keynesian revolution in economic strategies. The point is that the rise of Keynesianism is credited to incomparable economic success during the period between the end of the second World War and 1973 industrial market economies. This was because Keynesianism emphasized the significance of fiscal policy, which caused in the perfected economic execution during the âGolden Ageâ epoch (Atesoglu, H.1999). Great functioning can be accredited to an intensification in the liberalization of the universal trade and transactions, uplifting economic strategies that led to minimal inflation rates in terms of buoyant aggregate demand, the amplified governmental support of buoyant internal demand, and the accretion of growth potentialities after the end of the second World. For example, GDP per capita in Western Europe augmented by 4.08 per cent during 1950-1973, the growth and expansion were seen in centrally designed economies, such as Africa , Latin America, and Asia. The âPeakâ of unrivaled economic success finished after 1973, with the economic stagnation of the 1970s steering to the fall of Keynesianism. The 1970s stagnation was described by the rising rates of inflation and unemployment, and the cut-rate of economic growth. According to Keynesian criticizers, the economic stagnation credited to the erroneous expansionary strategies embraced under the disguise of Keynesian economy. For example, from 1960 until 2002, average unemployment and inflation rates were extremely low. During 1983 until 1993, the inflation decreased, but unemployment rates were up in most countries, specifically in Western Europe, which credited to hysteresis outcomes and rigidities in the labor market (Guillermo & Rodrigo 2008, 147). In the recent period of 1994-2002, it is obvious that inflation rates were minimal, but unemployment rates have raised in Western Europe and dropped in America. It is only around 1973-1983 that high inflation and high unemployment rates were recorded instantaneously. This was described as stagflation. According to Keynesianism criticizers stagflation was an inevitable inheritance of demand management policies associated with Keynesian economics (Baumol and Blinder, 2006) Economists emphasize that there are two principal reasons of stagflation. First, a negative supply shock can decrease the productive ability of an economy. Examples of unfavorable shocks involve a raise in oil prices for an importing nation. Such shocks have an inclination of raising prices and slowing down the economy by the increasing costs of production and reducing lucrativeness at the same time (Guillermo & Rodrigo 2008). The second plausible cause of stagnation is inappropriate macroeconomic strategies. For exam>
credited to a conservative opinion that economic stability during the post-war era was quite higher than in the pre-1914 era, which was depicted by the Keynesian revolution in economic strategies. The point is that the rise of Keynesianism is credited to incomparable economic success during the period between the end of the second World War and 1973 industrial market economies. This was because Keynesianism emphasized the significance of fiscal policy, which caused in the perfected economic execution during the âGolden Ageâ epoch (Atesoglu, H.1999). Great functioning can be accredited to an intensification in the liberalization of the universal trade and transactions, uplifting economic strategies that led to minimal inflation rates in terms of buoyant aggregate demand, the amplified governmental support of buoyant internal demand, and the accretion of growth potentialities after the end of the second World. For example, GDP per capita in Western Europe augmented by 4.08 per cent during 1950-1973, the growth and expansion were seen in centrally designed economies, such as Africa , Latin America, and Asia. The âPeakâ of unrivaled economic success finished after 1973, with the economic stagnation of the 1970s steering to the fall of Keynesianism. The 1970s stagnation was described by the rising rates of inflation and unemployment, and the cut-rate of economic growth. According to Keynesian criticizers, the economic stagnation credited to the erroneous expansionary strategies embraced under the disguise of Keynesian economy. For example, from 1960 until 2002, average unemployment and inflation rates were extremely low. During 1983 until 1993, the inflation decreased, but unemployment rates were up in most countries, specifically in Western Europe, which credited to hysteresis outcomes and rigidities in the labor market (Guillermo & Rodrigo 2008, 147). In the recent period of 1994-2002, it is obvious that inflation rates were minimal, but unemployment rates have raised in Western Europe and dropped in America. It is only around 1973-1983 that high inflation and high unemployment rates were recorded instantaneously. This was described as stagflation. According to Keynesianism criticizers stagflation was an inevitable inheritance of demand management policies associated with Keynesian economics (Baumol and Blinder, 2006) Economists emphasize that there are two principal reasons of stagflation. First, a negative supply shock can decrease the productive ability of an economy. Examples of unfavorable shocks involve a raise in oil prices for an importing nation. Such shocks have an inclination of raising prices and slowing down the economy by the increasing costs of production and reducing lucrativeness at the same time (Guillermo & Rodrigo 2008). The second plausible cause of stagnation is inappropriate macroeconomic strategies. For exam>
