Select a poem, musical piece, or dance piece to use as a point of inspiration. Create a work of poetry, lyrics, music, or dance, inspired by your selected art piece. Video or audio recordings should be no longer than 5 minutes and must be in MP4 format.
Part 2: Reflection
Write a reflection about the relationship between your art production and the inspiration piece. Include the following in the reflection paper:
Introduction
Inspiration Piece
Include the inspiration poem, lyrics, or recording of musical or dance piece within the document. Use a link in the case of a recording.
Record the title, artist/author/composer, year, and place of origin.
Briefly explain the background of the inspiration piece.
Your Art Piece
Include your original poem or lyrics within the document. If you selected a musical or dance piece, submit as a separate file in the Art Creation Submission (Recordings) area following this assignment.
Provide a title.
Explain the background of your piece.
Connection
Explain the thematic connection between the two pieces.
How are they similar and different?
Sample Solution
sults regarding mean duration of sensory blockade depicted the association between the dose of local anaesthetic used and duration of blockade.[8],[17] The degree of motor block was significantly more in group B as compared to group L. Similar to our study Casimiro C et al[8] found that the proportion of patients with motor blockade as determined by the modified Bromage scale was statistically different; patients allocated to levobupivacaine group showed a higher proportion of lack of motor blockade than bupivacaine. The decreased motor block seen with levobupivacaine may be due to decreased potency of levobupivacaine as compared to bupivacaine.[15],16]However in another study, Kara F et al[11] found that there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of quality or degree of motor block for both groups (p>0.05). Haemodynamic parameters in both groups did not differ significantly with respect to heart rate and blood pressure at any time interval, which is consistent with the study done by Kara F et al[11] on comparison of epidural 0.5% bupivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine administration on epidural anaesthesia quality found no significant changes in the hemodynamic variants for bupivacaine and levobupivacaine, and also supported by Casimiro et al[8]. The stable haemodynamic parameters can be explained by lower volume of local anaesthetic agent used along with fentanyl as an adjuvant which has a dose sparing effect. However fentanyl may increase the incidence of pruritus, nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression and urinary retention, which were comparable between two groups.[1] In contrast Kopacz et al[13], reported that hypotension was the most common side effect and was experienced by a similar proportion of patients in both treatment groups at the start of surgery (21% levobupivacaine, 18% bupivacaine) and during surgery (32% in both treatment groups). This may be due to use of higher concentration (0.75%) of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in their study. In another study done by Kara F et al[11] compared the effects of epidural 0.5% bupivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine administration on quality of anaesthesia, incidence of side effects, and time for requirement of analgesia in hip and lower extremity surgery found no significant difference in side effect profile in bot>
sults regarding mean duration of sensory blockade depicted the association between the dose of local anaesthetic used and duration of blockade.[8],[17] The degree of motor block was significantly more in group B as compared to group L. Similar to our study Casimiro C et al[8] found that the proportion of patients with motor blockade as determined by the modified Bromage scale was statistically different; patients allocated to levobupivacaine group showed a higher proportion of lack of motor blockade than bupivacaine. The decreased motor block seen with levobupivacaine may be due to decreased potency of levobupivacaine as compared to bupivacaine.[15],16]However in another study, Kara F et al[11] found that there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of quality or degree of motor block for both groups (p>0.05). Haemodynamic parameters in both groups did not differ significantly with respect to heart rate and blood pressure at any time interval, which is consistent with the study done by Kara F et al[11] on comparison of epidural 0.5% bupivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine administration on epidural anaesthesia quality found no significant changes in the hemodynamic variants for bupivacaine and levobupivacaine, and also supported by Casimiro et al[8]. The stable haemodynamic parameters can be explained by lower volume of local anaesthetic agent used along with fentanyl as an adjuvant which has a dose sparing effect. However fentanyl may increase the incidence of pruritus, nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression and urinary retention, which were comparable between two groups.[1] In contrast Kopacz et al[13], reported that hypotension was the most common side effect and was experienced by a similar proportion of patients in both treatment groups at the start of surgery (21% levobupivacaine, 18% bupivacaine) and during surgery (32% in both treatment groups). This may be due to use of higher concentration (0.75%) of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in their study. In another study done by Kara F et al[11] compared the effects of epidural 0.5% bupivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine administration on quality of anaesthesia, incidence of side effects, and time for requirement of analgesia in hip and lower extremity surgery found no significant difference in side effect profile in bot>
