We can work on AN INFANT CASE STUDY—SAM

Many changes happen from conception to birth. A single-celled zygote multiplies and grows over approximately 9 months into a living, breathing human being composed of trillions of cells. That’s quite an amazing feat! With such rapid growth occurring, it is not surprising that the developing fetus is vulnerable to a number of different environmental influences.For this Assignment, you will examine an infant case study to determine short-term developmental outcomes.Refer to the following Case Study about Sam, a male infant:An infant male, Sam, was born to Jane and Roberto. Jane works in the city as a medical transcriptionist, but requested 12 weeks of family leave effective immediately upon Sam’s birth. Sam was born 6 weeks premature, by Cesarean delivery. His Apgar score at 1 minute was 5; after receiving oxygen, his Apgar score at 5 minutes was 8. Apart from the first few minutes after birth, Sam has not required oxygen or respiratory assistance. Because of his prematurity, Sam stayed in the hospital for 72 hours before he was discharged. Jane drank occasionally throughout the pregnancy, but reported drinking most heavily during the last trimester of her pregnancy, which was about the time Roberto got laid off from his job. There is suspicion, although not confirmed, that Sam has Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD). Sam is a fussy eater, requiring short and frequent feedings. He has been home for 2 weeks and wakes up hungry every 2 hours. He does not sleep through the night. Roberto and Jane live in a house in a rural area. They do not have a network of friends and family who live nearby who can help, but Jane’s mother has offered to move in with them temporarily. Roberto and Jane’s mother get along very well. Jane is debating whether she should reduce her family leave and go back to work earlier than she had planned.Many of the details in the above case study have purposely been left ambiguous (e.g., ethnicity, geographic location, etc.) so that you can make some conjectures of your own and relate that to Sam’s short-term and long-term prognosis. To prepare for this Assignment:

Review the Learning Resources for this week and consider any environmental factors that might affect the infant’s development.
Search the Internet and/or the Walden library to find articles related to the case study that might support your findings.
For this Assignment:Write a 2- to 3-page paper and include the following:

Explain the environmental factors presented in the Case Study, as well as others that may be present but not specifically identified in the Case Study that might affect Sam’s development.
With the environmental factors you explained, further explain what you think the best case scenario and the worst case scenario might be for Sam’s short-term developmental outcomes and explain why.

Sample Solution

find the cost of your paper
facebookShare on Facebook

TwitterTweet

FollowFollow us

Wright’s impact should be visible across a wide range of current engineering. A prominent model is the Inn Marques de Riscal in Spain. This inn takes numerous ideas Wright utilized and expands on them, and the outcome is a piece of engineering that — similarly as Wright planned — feels natural and associated with the scene. The inn comprises of two principal parts: the primary design, which is constructed generally of stone and wood, and the veneer, which appears to imitate an undulating piece of texture. The materials utilized in the principal structure feel crude, bringing out a feeling that the inn is associated with the earth. Radiates supporting the exterior copy trees, further overcoming any barrier among building and nature. The engineer behind the Lodging additionally adjusted Wright’s vision by deciding to involve materials in contemporary ways. The undulating exterior shows up delicate and delicate, The Lodging Marques de Riscal in Elciego, Spain. The primary structure is hung in a bright metallic drape which appears to imitate the tenderly terraced scene, and the piece on the right is shrouded in ivy, appearing to attach it to the ground. Additionally note the tree-like help radiates holding up the metal parts. however, it is put together with metal, something customarily carried out in straight, rakish plans. This eccentric is suggestive of Wright’s making concrete into a tastefully satisfying material when it had already just been however of as utilitarian. Moreover, the inn is worked on a centuries-old wine basement. In arranging this task, the planners figured out how to save the basement and take on it as a feature of the inn’s appeal as opposed to evening out the land and obliterating the basement. This mirror’s one more piece of Wright’s plan reasoning — he accepted a structure ought to never hurt the scene but instead supplement it. Different structures have attracted motivation from Wright more obvious ways. A home in Polo Illinois, planned in 1962 by Verne Lars Solberg, shares practically its plan components with Wright’s all’s Usonian homes; this is promptly clear when contrasted one next to the other and the Wright-planned Shavin house in Chattanooga, Tennessee. It has similar low-calculated rooftop, the enormous, corner windows, and the inclination for normal materials. The house is additionally like the Shavin House in the idea of its relationship to the scene; the two houses appear to have The Seamour and Gerte Shavin House in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Planned by Straightforward Lloyd Wright and finished in 1952, it is an amazing illustration of his Usonian style. Polo, Illinois home worked by Verne Lars Solberg in 1962, three years after Wright’s passing. It’s comparability to the Shavin House is clear in the materials, the roofline, the windows, and the manner in which it cooperates with the scene. been worked on a slight slope — such a ridge would frequently be evened out off to have a level parcel to work with, however Solberg, similar to Wright, chose to permit the scenes regular excellence to justify itself. He left the scene’s unique shapes, as well as the local trees, obviously adding a couple of little bushes around the house. Due to the sporadic state of the land, these homes were planned explicitly for their parcels, and in the two cases, the two complete one another; as Wright once said in a meeting, he accepted the structure and the scene ought to be “each the more joyful for the other.” Changing to the inside of the home, there are likewise numerous similitudes here. The two insides are overwhelmingly wooden, with loads of regular light entering through their huge windows. Additionally clear in this house are its cantilevered overhangs. What’s more, to wrap things up, the home highlights furniture planned by Solberg explicitly for the home, something Wright likewise accomplished for the overwhelming majority of his Usonian homes (counting the Shavin House).>

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples