We can work on Amended Stakeholder Identification

Your instructor will choose two incidents from the Short Incidents for Ethical Reasoning that follow Ch. 8 of your textbook. After reading each incident, you must identify all relevant stakeholders and determine how they could be impacted by the decision that will be made, identify and apply at least one principle for ethical reasoning, and then consider alternative courses of action and choose the best course of action based on stakeholder impacts and the outcome of the application of the ethical principle.

Your textbook defines stakeholders as an entity that is benefitted or burdened by the actions of a corporation or whose actions may benefit or burden the corporation. Some common examples of stakeholders would include customers, employees, suppliers, stockholders, and the community.

Businesses will almost always have multiple stakeholders, and many times their interests will conflict. This means that a business decision-maker will frequently have to make a decision in the face of competing claims from different stakeholders. The question of whose interests should be prioritized requires the exercise of judgment. This skill—examining competing claims and deciding which one is the strongest—is called evaluation. You will want to consider the power, urgency, and legitimacy that each stakeholder presents.

You should put yourselves in each stakeholder’s position—Why do they care about the outcome of the decision? How will they be affected? What outcome would they prefer? What are their arguments in support of their preferred outcome? You will want to consider the power, urgency, and legitimacy that each stakeholder presents. Two of the videos below will give you a brief review of stakeholder theory and give you an idea of what skills you will be expected to demonstrate when you complete this assignment. Additionally, writing mechanics and grammar are graded as part of this assignment. A video on improving mechanics in business writing is provided below to help refresh your memory. Viewing statistics will be collected and counted as part of the assignment’s grade.

David VanBuskir https://sorrell.mediasite.com/mediasite/Play/9f2000caa3a3424099b80fe0e96aca2b1d

Mediasite Presenter https://sorrell.mediasite.com/mediasite/Play/eb1759d6fd85447fa74eb099c25cbb5d1d

Mediasite Presenter https://sorrell.mediasite.com/mediasite/Play/9fd4b…

As a reminder, for each incident, be sure to identify all relevant stakeholders and determine how they could be impacted by the decision that will be made, identify and apply at least one principle for ethical reasoning, and then consider alternative courses of action and choose the best course of action based on stakeholder impacts and the outcome of the application of the ethical principle.

Sample Solution

body in his slither space. Gacy conceded in the meetings following his capture that slaughtering McCoy gave him a “mind-desensitizing climax”, expressing that this homicide was the point at which he “understood passing was a definitive rush” (Cahill and Ewing 349). Very nearly 2 years after the fact, Gacy submits his second homicide of a unidentified adolescent. Gacy choked the kid before stuffing the body in his wardrobe before covering him (Cahill 349). In 1975, Gacy’s business was developing rapidly and his craving for youngsters developed with it. Gacy frequently tricked youngsters under his work to his home, persuading them to place themselves in binds, and assaulting and tormenting them before choking them (Cahill 169-170). The majority of Gacy’s homicides occurred somewhere in the range of 1976 and 1978, the first of this time occurring in April 1976. Huge numbers of the young people that were killed during this time were covered in a creep space under Gacy’s home. For the rest of the homicides, Gacy confessed to losing five bodies the I-55 extension into the Des Plaines River; nonetheless, just four of the bodies were ever recouped (Linedecker 152). In December 1978, Gacy meets Robert Jerome Piest, a 15-year old kid working at a drug store and extends to him an employment opportunity at Gacy’s firm. Piest educates his mom regarding this and neglects to restore that night. The Piest family documents a missing individual’s report and the drug specialist educates police that Gacy would no doubt be the man that Jerome addressed about an occupation. When addressed by the police, Gacy denied any contribution in Piest’s vanishing. Nonetheless, the police were not persuaded, and Gacy’s history of sexual maltreatment and battery provoked the police to look through his home. Among the things found at Gacy’s home were a 1975 secondary school class ring with the initials J.A.S., different driver’s licenses, cuffs, dress that was unreasonably little for Gacy, and a receipt for the drug store that Piest had worked at. Through the span of the following not many days, specialists got various calls and tips about Gacy’s rapes and the strange vanishings of Gacy’s representatives. The class ring was in the end followed back to John A. Szyc, one of Gacy’s casualties in 1977. Futhermore, after analyzing Gacy’s vehicle, specialists found a little bunch of strands looking like human hair, which were sent to the labs for additional investigation. That equivalent night, search hounds were utilized to identify any hint of Piest in Gacy’s vehicle, and one of the mutts showed that Piest had, truth be told, been available in the vehicle. On December 20, 1977, under the pressure of steady police reconnaissance and examination, Gacy admits to more than 30 killings and illuminates his attorney and companion where the bodies were covered, both in the creep space and the waterway. 26 casualties were found in the slither space and 4 in the stream. Gacy is captured, indicted for 33 killings, and condemned to death by deadly infusion. He endeavored a craziness request yet was denied, and was executed on May 10, 1994. There were a few criminological pointers that examiners used to attach Gacy to the killings. A portion of these include fiber examination, dental and radiology records, utilizing the deterioration procedure of the human body, and facial remaking in distinguishing the people in question. Examiners discovered strands that looked like human hair in both Gacy’s vehicle and close to the slither space where the bodies were covered. Notwithstanding these hair tests, examiners likewise discovered strands that contained hints of Gacy’s blood and semen in a similar region. Blood having a place with the casualties was found on a portion of the filaments, which would later legitimately attach Gacy to the violations. The strands in Gacy’s vehicle were investigated by scientific researchers and coordinated Piest’s hair tests. Besides, the hunt hounds that established that Piest had been in Gacy’s vehicle demonstrated this by a “demise response”, which told examiners that Piest’s dead body had been within Gacy’s vehicle. Out of Gacy’s 33 known casualties, just 25 were ever convincingly distinguished. A large number of Gacy’s casualties had comparative physical depictions and were along these lines hard to recognize by absolutely asking people in general. To distinguish the people in question, agents went to Betty Pat Gatliff, a pioneer in legal science and facial reproduction. Facial remaking is the way toward reproducing the facial highlights of a person by utilizing their remaining parts. Certain facial highlights, for example, facial structures, nasal structure, and generally face shape can be valuable in recognizing a casualty even long in the afterlife. By utilizing these highlights, and with the assistance of program, legal examiners can make a picture of an individual’s face, which is instrumental in recognizing casualties after their bodies have rotted. Facial recreation should be possible in a few measurements. Two-dimensional facial recreations is utilized with skull radiographs and depend on pre-demise photos and data. In any case, this isn’t really perfect on the grounds that cranial highlights are not constantly noticeable or at the correct scale (Downing). So as to get a sensible and increasingly precise portrayal of the casualty’s face, a craftsman and a scientific anthropologist are normally important (Downing). Three-dimensional facial recreation is finished by figures or high goals, three-dimensional pictures. PC programs can make facial reproductions by controlling checked photos of the remaining parts and use approximations to reproduce facial highlights. These will in general produce results that don’t look counterfeit (Reichs and Craig 491). Now and then, examiners will utilize a strategy called superimposition as a system for facial remaking. Shockingly, it’s anything but an ordinarily utilized technique, as it expects specialists to have some information about the personality of the remaining parts they are managing. By superimposing a photo of a person over the skeletal remains, examiners can check whether the facial highlights line up with the anatomical highlights, permitting them to recognize a casualty. On account of John Wayne Gacy’s casualties, specialists had the option to utilize facial recreation to recognize nine of the bodies found in the creep space. The accompanying realistic shows the facial reproductions of these nine casualties: Since facial recreation was insufficient to distinguish the entirety of the people in question, examiners got DNA profiles from every one of the unidentified casualties and effectively searched out DNA tests from guys over the United States who had been accounted for missing somewhere in the range of 1970 and 1979 (Cook County Sheriff’s Office 3). The rest of the casualties were recognized utilizing dental and radiology records. Since dental polish is harder than bone, teeth outlive tissue and here and there bone when the body decays. Teeth are entirely solid in distinguishing casualties, as they will in general uncover propensities about the individual, for example, nail gnawing, crushing and weight propensities, lip gnawing, and grasping (Ryan 254). Besides, the top of the mouth, which frames a curve, is one of a kind to every person fit as a fiddle, size, and form. Teeth likewise have singular qualities that are one of a kind to every individual in that the relationship of teeth to each other fluctuates, alongside size and state of the jaws and sense of taste (Ryan 255). So as to recognize an individual utilizing dental records, legal dental specialists must obtain the dental records of the person in question or perished. In cases including various passings, measurable dental specialists get a rundown of potential people and afterward contrast records with the teeth (Freeman standard. 2). Much of the time, X-beams are viewed as progressively solid and give the best examinations, yet these are not constantly accessible to criminological specialists. When the dental records have been procured, measurable specialists at that point take a gander at the individual tooth size, shading, and form, curve sizes and types, and the connection between the jaws, which is utilized to help group facial sorts (Ryan 256). Despite the fact that John Wayne Gacy’s latest casualty was Robert Piest in 1978, specialists in Cook County are as yet looking for recognizable proof for the rest of the bodies. The most as of late distinguished casualty, William Bundy, was convincingly recognized in 2011. The Cook County Sheriff’s specialty declared that year that they were restoring their endeavors to distinguish the staying seven of Gacy’s casualties. Be that as it may, nobody has since approached to definitively distinguish them, and their names stay obscure. John Wayne Gacy was one of America’s most productive sequential executioners. With a casualty include of 33 youngsters in a three-year range of time, Gacy was condemned to death by willful extermination for his wrongdoings. Legal researchers and specialists had the option to attach Gacy to the killings by utilizing dental and radiology records, facial reproduction, and DNA proof. Without the utilization of legal innovation and the exertion set forth by the examiners, Gacy would have kept submitting murders and a large number of the casualties would have gone unnoticed. While the case has been cold for a long time, specialists are as yet attempting to distinguish the rest of the casualties so as to give bit of brain to the groups of the expired. John W>

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples