At some point in every construction project, efforts turn from design and the focus moves to actual construction. With the vision in place and the tools secured, the blueprint can be finalized and approved. Then it is time to put on hardhats and begin work.
Throughout the course you have developed aspects of your Academic and Professional Development Plan. You have thought a great deal about your vision and goals, your academic and professional network of support, research strategies and other tools you will need, the integrity of your work, and the value of consulting the work of others. With your portfolio in place, it is now time to finalize your blueprint for success.
Much as builders remain cognizant of the building standards as they plan and begin construction, nurses must remain mindful of the formal standards of practice that govern their specialties. A good understanding of these standards can help ensure that your success plan includes any steps necessary to excel within your chosen specialty.
In this Assignment you will continue developing your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan by developing the final componentâa review of your specialty standards of practice. You will also submit your final version of the document, including Parts 1â4.
Note: For students in Nursing Education, Executive Nursing, Nursing Informatics, or Public Health Nursing, this Assignment is the first Portfolio Assignment in your program. You will have one Portfolio Assignment in each of your courses. You will need to save these Assignments for inclusion in your portfolio that you will submit in your Capstone course.
Review the scope and standards of practice or competencies related to your chosen specialty in the resources for this module.
Review the MSN specializations offered at Walden by viewing the module resource, Walden University. (n.d.). Master of Science in Nursing (MSN).
Examine professional organizations related to the specialization you have chosen and identify at least one to focus on for this Assignment.
Reflect on the thoughts you shared in the Discussion forum regarding your choice of a specialty, any challenges you have encountered in making this choice, and any feedback you have received from colleagues in the Discussion.
The Assignment:
Complete the following items and incorporate them into the final version of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan.
With the resources specific to the MSN specialization and the, Walden University. (n.d.). Master of Science in Nursing (MSN), shared in this module, write a paragraph or make a Nursing Specialty Comparison table, comparing at least two nursing specialties that include your selected specialization and second-preferred specialization.
Write a 2- to 3-paragraph justification statement identifying your reasons for choosing your MSN specialization. Incorporate feedback you received from colleagues in this Moduleâs Discussion forum.
Identify the professional organization related to your chosen specialization for this Assignment, and explain how you can become an active member of this organization.
Sample Solution
that he submerses the Leviathan (as a reference to the scriptural monster) is a definitive getaway from a state where individuals have limitless freedoms, yet dread is indisputably the sovereign and war is the main consistent. However he is fairly vocal about his favored type of government being a flat out government, there is still some discussion in whether the Leviathan Hobbes depicted really takes such structure. Hence, it stays the topic of what is the genuine type of this political element? In Machiavelli’s The Sovereign, he guarantees that all legislatures in his time have either been represented by one man as in a realm or more than one man as in fair or oligarchic republics (Machiavelli, 5). Alongside being a rule of various individuals, a conservative government in Cunning terms is a state where its kin are “familiar with residing by their own regulations and in freedom” (Machiavelli, 20). In light of these definitions I accept that the ideal Hobbesian Leviathan is both a realm and a republic as the sovereign uses the express’ all’s power separately, however is simply the head to the political element, as he makes and upholds regulation determined to address, serving, and safeguarding individuals. By consenting to the common agreement, the majority free themselves of the incapacitating apprehension about the condition of nature and make themselves, the creators of the Leviathan, however of every last one of his activities. Subsequently one could say that a Hobbesian republic considers individuals to live “by their own regulations” (Machiavelli, 20). As Thomas Hobbes was a vocal supporter for outright power as the best type of government, finding hints of his absolutism inside the Leviathan is remarkably difficult not. One illustration of this is the unification of the workplace of the sovereign, wherein Hobbes shows while examining the damage of having unlimited agents, who he calls “second sovereigns.” He states, “For that were to raise two sovereigns, and each man to have his individual addressed by two entertainers that by contradicting each other must requirements partition that power which (assuming men will live in harmony) is unified, and in this way diminish the large number into the state of war, in spite of the end for which all sway is organized” (Hobbes, pg.119, s.3). This means that the ideal Leviathan can’t have everything except a singular ruler, as the irregularity and potential contentions that might emerge from having various pioneers forces a danger to the harmony and security of those in the region. One more hint of the monarchic Leviathan, is when Hobbes expresses the that sovereign ought not be restricted, yet incomparable: “that ruler whose power is restricted isn’t better than him or them that have the ability to restrict it; and he that isn’t prevalent isn’t incomparable, in other words not sovereign” (Hobbes, pg.123, s.12). In portraying a region, Hobbes calls the top of the Leviathan and the transporter of the consolidated state’s power, a “sovereign.” Nonetheless, in this statement, he expresses that one isn’t viewed as a sovereign except if their power is preeminent and limitless. This can’t be accomplished in that frame of mind of unlimited agents or two sovereigns, as their powers would possibly restrict one another. They would likewise not be better than one another and accordingly, not preeminent. Consequently, to be viewed as a sovereign, the top of the Leviathan should be a person with limitless power. However represented by a solitary ruler or a ruler, the Leviathan is one of conservative beginnings and purposes as it was made by individuals, to support individuals, which leave them responsible to the incomparable Leviathan’s activities. This is featured in Hobbes’ meaning of the District:>
GET ANSWER
that he submerses the Leviathan (as a reference to the scriptural monster) is a definitive getaway from a state where individuals have limitless freedoms, yet dread is indisputably the sovereign and war is the main consistent. However he is fairly vocal about his favored type of government being a flat out government, there is still some discussion in whether the Leviathan Hobbes depicted really takes such structure. Hence, it stays the topic of what is the genuine type of this political element? In Machiavelli’s The Sovereign, he guarantees that all legislatures in his time have either been represented by one man as in a realm or more than one man as in fair or oligarchic republics (Machiavelli, 5). Alongside being a rule of various individuals, a conservative government in Cunning terms is a state where its kin are “familiar with residing by their own regulations and in freedom” (Machiavelli, 20). In light of these definitions I accept that the ideal Hobbesian Leviathan is both a realm and a republic as the sovereign uses the express’ all’s power separately, however is simply the head to the political element, as he makes and upholds regulation determined to address, serving, and safeguarding individuals. By consenting to the common agreement, the majority free themselves of the incapacitating apprehension about the condition of nature and make themselves, the creators of the Leviathan, however of every last one of his activities. Subsequently one could say that a Hobbesian republic considers individuals to live “by their own regulations” (Machiavelli, 20). As Thomas Hobbes was a vocal supporter for outright power as the best type of government, finding hints of his absolutism inside the Leviathan is remarkably difficult not. One illustration of this is the unification of the workplace of the sovereign, wherein Hobbes shows while examining the damage of having unlimited agents, who he calls “second sovereigns.” He states, “For that were to raise two sovereigns, and each man to have his individual addressed by two entertainers that by contradicting each other must requirements partition that power which (assuming men will live in harmony) is unified, and in this way diminish the large number into the state of war, in spite of the end for which all sway is organized” (Hobbes, pg.119, s.3). This means that the ideal Leviathan can’t have everything except a singular ruler, as the irregularity and potential contentions that might emerge from having various pioneers forces a danger to the harmony and security of those in the region. One more hint of the monarchic Leviathan, is when Hobbes expresses the that sovereign ought not be restricted, yet incomparable: “that ruler whose power is restricted isn’t better than him or them that have the ability to restrict it; and he that isn’t prevalent isn’t incomparable, in other words not sovereign” (Hobbes, pg.123, s.12). In portraying a region, Hobbes calls the top of the Leviathan and the transporter of the consolidated state’s power, a “sovereign.” Nonetheless, in this statement, he expresses that one isn’t viewed as a sovereign except if their power is preeminent and limitless. This can’t be accomplished in that frame of mind of unlimited agents or two sovereigns, as their powers would possibly restrict one another. They would likewise not be better than one another and accordingly, not preeminent. Consequently, to be viewed as a sovereign, the top of the Leviathan should be a person with limitless power. However represented by a solitary ruler or a ruler, the Leviathan is one of conservative beginnings and purposes as it was made by individuals, to support individuals, which leave them responsible to the incomparable Leviathan’s activities. This is featured in Hobbes’ meaning of the District:>
