Business partnerships, collaborations, alliances, mergers and acquisitions, are
all seen as classifications of the various forms of business rearrangements,
usually with the intension to diversify and growth businesses.
At what point are these business strategies or rearrangements beneficial and at
what point are these strategies or rearrangements actually contra productive?
Embark on a research project by identifying two or three multinational
companies that evidently engaged in any form of these business strategies or
rearrangements, and find out the outcomes of their strategies or rearrangements.
Discuss the positive or negative consequences of the business arrangements of
these companies you have selected, by producing a research paper elaborating
on your findings.
Sample Solution
Nishit V. Davda in his examination paper “A Comparative Study of Selected Private Sector Banks in India (2012)”, has analyzed the financial presentation and maintainability of six significant banks in the private financial division â ICICI bank, HDFC bank, AXIS bank, IndusInd bank, ING VYSYA bank and Kotak Mahindra bank. The benefit position of the chose banks for a time of ten years from 2002 to 2011 was dissected. The investigation distinguishes that HDFC has performed better as far as Earning per Share (EPS) than other chose banks during the previously mentioned period. The examination additionally recognizes that Kotak Mahindra bank was the best entertainer regarding Net â Profit Margin (NPM), trailed by HDFC bank. ICICI bank has the best yield on Assets (ROA) when contrasted with other chose banks. Targets of the Study To investigate the benefit position of the chose private area banks To determine the variables that impacts the venture dynamic To determine the best venture choice Speculation HO: There is no noteworthy contrast between the chose factors of chosen banks H1: There is a critical distinction between the chose factors of chosen banks Technique The investigation covers five private area banks in India â HDFC bank, ICICI bank, Axis bank, Yes bank and Kotak Mahindra bank from budgetary year 2013-14 to 2017-18. The optional information was utilized with the end goal of this investigation. All the optional information utilized in the investigation was gathered from Equitymaster (www.equitymaster.com) database. The auxiliary information was utilized to decide the productivity position of the banks. The variable which were considered for deciding the productivity position were Return on Equity (ROE), Net Profit Margin (NPM), Return on Assets (ROA), Price to Earnings proportion (P/E), Debt to Equity proportion (D/E), Net Non â Performing Assets (NPA), Earnings per Share (EPS) and Dividen>
Nishit V. Davda in his examination paper “A Comparative Study of Selected Private Sector Banks in India (2012)”, has analyzed the financial presentation and maintainability of six significant banks in the private financial division â ICICI bank, HDFC bank, AXIS bank, IndusInd bank, ING VYSYA bank and Kotak Mahindra bank. The benefit position of the chose banks for a time of ten years from 2002 to 2011 was dissected. The investigation distinguishes that HDFC has performed better as far as Earning per Share (EPS) than other chose banks during the previously mentioned period. The examination additionally recognizes that Kotak Mahindra bank was the best entertainer regarding Net â Profit Margin (NPM), trailed by HDFC bank. ICICI bank has the best yield on Assets (ROA) when contrasted with other chose banks. Targets of the Study To investigate the benefit position of the chose private area banks To determine the variables that impacts the venture dynamic To determine the best venture choice Speculation HO: There is no noteworthy contrast between the chose factors of chosen banks H1: There is a critical distinction between the chose factors of chosen banks Technique The investigation covers five private area banks in India â HDFC bank, ICICI bank, Axis bank, Yes bank and Kotak Mahindra bank from budgetary year 2013-14 to 2017-18. The optional information was utilized with the end goal of this investigation. All the optional information utilized in the investigation was gathered from Equitymaster (www.equitymaster.com) database. The auxiliary information was utilized to decide the productivity position of the banks. The variable which were considered for deciding the productivity position were Return on Equity (ROE), Net Profit Margin (NPM), Return on Assets (ROA), Price to Earnings proportion (P/E), Debt to Equity proportion (D/E), Net Non â Performing Assets (NPA), Earnings per Share (EPS) and Dividen>
