We can work on A letter to an official in your state or local government.

Write a letter to an official in your state or local government. (Choose the individual in the level of government that will best address your issue). The purpose of this letter is to advocate for action with regards to your chosen health care environment issue.

As a master’s-level health care practitioner, you may be expected to implement plans to ensure that initiatives designed to take advantage of economic opportunities for the organization are rolled out successfully and can be sustained over multiple years. Additionally, it is important to be able to envision how an initiative could be implemented in different contexts and for different purposes to ensure the investment remains a viable and positive asset to your organization or care setting.
As a master’s-level practitioner, you will often be challenged to influence the health care environment in a variety of ways. This influence can occur on a micro-level (implementing change on your unit, institution, community, or local organizations) or at a macro level (implementing change via state or federal regulations and policy). One way you can influence the health care environment is by lobbying an elected official at the local, state, or national level to adopt policies or legislation that would support positive economic and health outcomes for patients, practitioners, and organizations within the health care environment.
Instructions
For this assessment, you will develop a letter to an official in your state or local government (choose the individual in the level of government that will best address your issue). The purpose of this letter is to advocate for action with regards to your chosen health care environment issue. Remember, when writing the letter, you must use your personal address and telephone number unless you are exclusively representing a group or your organization.
Be sure to address each main point. Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide, including performance-level descriptions for each criterion, to ensure you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed. In addition, note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.
Overall, your assessment submission will be assessed on the following criteria:
• Summarize the health care economic issue that you are addressing.
o Keep this brief but try to include details about how the issue is currently impacting the elected officials’ constituents.
• Explain the positive outcomes that will occur if the issue is addressed and the negative outcomes that will occur if the issue is not addressed.
o Tailor this messaging to focus on the impacts in the communities and organizations that are relevant to the elected official you are writing to.
• Summarize key information from scholarly sources to support the importance of addressing the issue; the issue’s overall impact on health care at the institutional, local, state, or national level; and proposed changes or actions to address the issue.
o Cite at least five current, scholarly sources that support your argument and help provide the elected official (who may not have a detailed knowledge of the health care environment) with an understanding of the issues, changes, or actions that you are proposing to drive improved outcomes.
o Identify the impact your issue has on health care institutions and health care providers at the local community, state, or national level.
o Make sure to include information from both a health care and an economic perspective. An elected official may be more responsive to one perspective than another.
o Incorporate social justice, structural racism, and inequity principles when picking resources and making recommendations for change in your assessment.
• Explain how personal, professional, and organizational experiences have informed the resource planning and risk analysis for working toward addressing the economic issue.
o Think about how your experiences (the experiences can be personal, professional, or from your team’s perspective or experience) affect how you have planned for the resources needed to implement your desired changes or actions. How did this impact your approach to conducting a risk analysis on the project?
• Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.
o Remember to conclude your letter with a summary of your position on the issue and a compelling reason that the elected official should act in your favor and support your issue or initiative.

find the cost of your paper
facebookShare on Facebook

TwitterTweet

FollowFollow us

Sample Answer

 

 

 

 

[Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Phone Number] [Your Email Address]

[Date]

The Honorable [Name of Elected Official] [Title of Elected Official] [Government Office Address]

Subject: Urgent Action Needed to Address the Economic Burden of Limited Access to Reliable Public Transportation for Healthcare in [Your City/County/State]

Dear Honorable [Last Name of Elected Official],

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

 

As a master’s-level healthcare practitioner in [Your City/County], I am writing to you today to advocate for immediate attention and action regarding the significant economic and health consequences stemming from the limited access to reliable public transportation for our community members seeking healthcare services. This issue disproportionately affects vulnerable populations, exacerbates existing health inequities, and places a considerable strain on our local healthcare system.

Currently, many residents in [Specific areas or neighborhoods within your jurisdiction] face substantial barriers in accessing essential medical appointments, mental health services, pharmacies, and other vital healthcare facilities due to inadequate or non-existent public transportation options. This often results in missed appointments, delayed care, and ultimately, poorer health outcomes. For instance, individuals with chronic conditions requiring regular monitoring, such as diabetes or heart disease, may struggle to attend crucial follow-up visits, leading to disease progression and increased emergency room utilization – a far more costly outcome for both individuals and the healthcare system. This lack of reliable transportation also impacts individuals seeking preventative care, further contributing to long-term health burdens and economic strain.

Addressing this issue will yield significant positive outcomes for our community. Improved access to healthcare through reliable public transportation will lead to:

  • Improved Health Outcomes: Timely access to preventative care, chronic disease management, and mental health services will result in a healthier population, reducing the incidence and severity of illness and improving overall well-being.
  • Reduced Healthcare Costs: Decreased reliance on emergency services for routine care and better management of chronic conditions will translate into lower healthcare costs for individuals, the local healthcare system, and potentially the state through reduced Medicaid/Medicare expenditures.
  • Increased Economic Opportunity: Reliable transportation can enable individuals to attend job interviews, reach employment, and access educational opportunities, fostering economic self-sufficiency and reducing reliance on social safety nets.
  • Enhanced Social Equity: Investing in public transportation directly addresses health inequities by providing a vital link to care for low-income individuals, the elderly, individuals with disabilities, and other marginalized groups who may lack personal vehicles or the means to afford alternative transportation.
  • Stronger Community Health Infrastructure: A robust public transportation system strengthens the overall healthcare infrastructure by ensuring that patients can readily connect with the services they need, regardless of their socioeconomic status or geographic location within our community.

Conversely, inaction on this issue will perpetuate and worsen the existing negative outcomes:

  • Worsening Health Disparities: The gap in health outcomes between those with and without reliable transportation will continue to widen, further marginalizing vulnerable populations.
  • Increased Healthcare Burden: Delayed and forgone care will lead to more severe health issues requiring more intensive and costly interventions, placing a greater strain on our local hospitals and clinics.
  • Reduced Economic Productivity: A sicker population is a less productive workforce, impacting local businesses and the overall economic vitality of [Your City/County/State].
  • Increased Social Costs: The social costs associated with poor health outcomes, such as increased disability rates and reduced quality of life, will continue to rise.

Scholarly research robustly supports the critical link between transportation access and health outcomes. A study published in the Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved (Syed, Gerber, & Sharp, 2013) found that transportation barriers significantly impede access to primary care, particularly for low-income populations, leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment. Furthermore, a report by the American Public Transportation Association (2017) highlights the economic benefits of public transportation investments, including reduced healthcare costs and increased economic activity.

The impact of limited transportation on our local healthcare institutions is tangible. [Mention a specific local hospital or clinic if you have data or anecdotal evidence]. For example, [Name of institution] reports a significant number of no-show appointments, particularly among patients residing in transportation-insecure areas, leading to inefficiencies in scheduling and wasted resources. Healthcare providers also face challenges in reaching patients for home healthcare visits or community-based outreach programs due to transportation limitations, hindering their ability to provide comprehensive care. From an economic perspective, these missed appointments and delayed treatments contribute to higher overall healthcare expenditures within our community.

My personal and professional experiences as a healthcare practitioner in [Your City/County] have directly informed my understanding of this issue. I have witnessed firsthand the frustration and distress of patients struggling to reach appointments, often delaying necessary care until their conditions have worsened. For example, [Share a brief, anonymized anecdote about a patient’s transportation challenges and its impact on their care]. This experience, coupled with my professional understanding of resource planning, highlights the inefficient allocation of healthcare resources when a fundamental barrier like transportation is not addressed. Our team’s experience in coordinating care for patients across various locations has consistently revealed transportation as a significant impediment to successful health management.

Considering the resource planning needed to address this issue, I envision a phased approach involving: (1) a comprehensive assessment of existing public transportation infrastructure and unmet needs in healthcare access hotspots; (2) exploring funding opportunities at the local, state, and potentially federal levels for expanding and enhancing public transportation routes and frequency, particularly those serving healthcare facilities; (3) collaborating with local transportation authorities to implement solutions such as dedicated healthcare shuttle services or subsidized transportation vouchers for eligible patients; and (4) establishing partnerships with community organizations and volunteer networks to provide supplementary transportation options.

A preliminary risk analysis identifies potential challenges such as securing adequate funding, overcoming bureaucratic hurdles in transportation planning, and ensuring community buy-in and utilization of new services. However, the potential positive economic and health outcomes far outweigh these risks. My experience in implementing community health initiatives has taught me the importance of strong stakeholder engagement and data-driven evaluation to mitigate these risks and ensure sustainability.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples