using evidence from the political ambition module in class, what do you think is the most compelling theory as to why women and men have differing ambition levels and how could this difference affect public policy in at least three ways in the US? Give specific examples and incorporate at least six scholarly articles and/or books and two news articles into your paper. Refer to at least 3 of them in your presentation. You are making a subjective argument (why do YOU think its the most compelling argument), but the choice you make must be based on supported evidence. Finally, how would you solve or at least mitigate the gap? Give me at least 2 concrete solutions.

Final paper rubric:

Thesis statement:15 points_______________

All questions are answered:10 points_______________

Argument is evidenced based and
Logical, based on the readings15 points_______________

Appropriate scholarly works cited
Throughout paper10 points_______________

Appropriate length 5 points_________________

Appropriate Style/grammar/spelling 10 points__________________

Creativity/original thinking 5 points__________________

Include in Sources:

Fridkin, Kim L. and Patrick J. Kenney. 2014. The Changing Face of Representation: The Gender of US Senators and Constitutent Communications.” University of Michigan Press.

Lawless, Jennifer and Richard Fox. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate. Cambridge University Press.

Murray, Rainbow (ed). 2010. Cracking the Highest Glass Ceiling: A Global Comparison of
Womens Campaign for Executive Office. Praeger.

Lectures:

http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/stable/40213336

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2012/11/07/women-make-historic-gains-in-the-u-s-senate/