choose one of the following themes, and then choose any 3-4 sources from Voices of a People’s History to provide an analysis of that theme using those sources. The sources are your choice– as long as they are found in your Voices text and/or listed on one of our class modules. Again, you must discuss at least three primary sources found in any of the chapters in Voices. You can connect them however you see fit regarding the theme that you choose to explore from the list below.
Themes to discuss:
The advocacy for suffrage (right to vote)
Genocide of Native Americans
Assimilation into U.S. society-through force or choice
Rigid gender expectations
Resistance to discrimination
The US unequal immigration system
The US government’s support of the rich over the poor
Labor antagonism (strikes, labor disputes)
African Americans and their push for physical freedom and/or civic equality
LGBTQ Movement
Women who resisted the norms and restrictions of society
War and soldiers
War and society
The War on Terror
American democracy
American imperialism abroad
This paper is a free thought paper. That means that you can freely choose which sources you use. The sources can agree with one another, or disagree with one another. You can focus on a certain time period, or use sources that span different time periods, including decades or centuries.
In terms of organization and structure, students are required to write a organized, coherent, and thoughtful 4-5 page double spaced paper that includes an introduction and a conclusion. The paper needs to be at least four pages, double spaced, in length. It must include discussion of three (or more) primary sources. If you choose to use more sources, students are expected to write a longer paper. In other words, don’t try to discuss so many sources that you aren’t able to thoughtfully reflect on them.
In the paper, discuss what the sources tell you about the theme you chose. What do they teach about the subject? Why are they significant? Do they differ? What does that suggest? Or are they woven together with similarities? Explain. Please understand that you don’t have to answer these exact questions in a rigid order. Rather, explore the sources as you wish, making sure to ultimately tell me what they say about the theme.
Sample Solution
he Battle of Waterloo, took place on The US unequal immigration system the eighteenth June 1815, was a long way from an ensured British triumph. In the expressions of the Duke of Wellington, in his dispatch to London, it was the âclosest run thing you at any point found in your life, by Godâ [1]. For the greater part of the day Wellingtonâs position appeared to be unsafe and a French triumph was just a single charge, assault or siege away. Similarly as with most fights on this scale, the explanations behind triumph are various.â However, two of these elements had an a lot more noteworthy impact on the course of the fight th The US unequal immigration system an others, they are âto be specificâ the landing of the Prussians at the urgent point and the ineptitude of two of Napoleonâs Marshalls. These two elements supplemented and improved different variables that incorporate; the administration of Wellington, th The US unequal immigration system e qualities of his military, the oversights of Napoleon, the annihilation of the Imperial Guard and the aftereffect of the skirmishes of Lingy and Quatre Bras. Over the span of this exposition, I will analyze records, histories and personal histories to decide the effect that Wellington had on the Battle of Waterloo To viably look at if Wellington was in charge of triumph at Waterloo, we first need to inspect the other main considerations. Battle of Waterloo Amid the Hundred Days Campaign (twentieth March to eighth July 1815) Napoleonâs 280,000 in number French armed force was looked with the joined 800,000 to 1,000,000 men of the countries of the seventh alliance (Britain, Austria, Russia and Prussia). Nonetheless, by the beginning of war on the thirteenth March 1815 just the militaries of>
he Battle of Waterloo, took place on the eighteenth June 1815, was a long way from an ensured British triumph. In the expressions of the Duke of Wellington, in his dispatch to London, it was the âclosest run thing you at any point found in your life, by Godâ [1]. For the greater part of the day Wellingtonâs position appeared The US unequal immigration system to be unsafe and a French triumph was just a single charge, assault or siege away. Similarly as with most fights on this scale, the explanations behind triumph are various.â However, two of these elements had an a lot more noteworthy impact on the course of the fight than others, they are âto be specificâ the landing of the Prussians at the urgent point and the ineptitude of two of Napoleonâs Marshalls. These two elements supplemented and improved different variables that incorporate The US unequal immigration system ; the administration of Wellington, the qualities of his military, the oversights of Napoleon, the annihilation of the Imperial Guard and the aftereffect of the skirmishes of Lingy and Quatre Bras. Over the span of this exposition, I will analyze records, histories and The US unequal immigration system personal histories to decide the effect that Wellington had on the Battle of Waterloo To viably look at if Wellington was in charge of triumph at Waterloo, we first need to inspect the other main considerations. Battle of Waterloo Amid the Hundred Days Campaign (twentieth March to eighth July 1815) Napoleonâs 280,000 in number French armed force was looked with the joined 800,000 to 1,000,000 men of the countries of the seventh alliance (Britain, Austria, Russia a The US unequal immigration system nd Prussia). Nonetheless, by the beginning of war on the thirteenth March 1815 just the militaries of>
