Description
The purpose of this paper is to take the analysis you have undertaken in Assignment 2 in relation to your project or thesis topic in health and/or nursing and consider how you would facilitate change in your organization or policy context to implement the changes you would like to see. You may wish to ask yourself the following questions as you approach the paper. The questions may or may not be relevant to your particular issue.
⢠What would be the goals for change? How do those goals relate to (or not relate to) the organizationâs strategic plan and/or provincial/federal policy directives?
⢠Given the various dimensions of this issue or policy, what needs to be considered in the particular context youâve identified in order for change to occur?
⢠What would be the various dimensions of the context(s) for implementation?
⢠What would be the forces influencing the implementation of changes/ the policy or practice (both external and internal to the organization)?
⢠What would be the levers for change?
⢠Who would be the partners you would need to work with?
⢠How would you as a leader work with those levers for change within the organization, and in partnership with others, to facilitate change?
⢠How might you address the most important facilitators and barriers?
⢠What might you do to recognize and act when progress is being made or not?
The paper would conclude with a realistic, short summary of the situation, a conclusion, the implications and the next steps forward to be taken by nurses/nurse practitioners.
This paper should be no more than 15 pages in length (excluding titleâpage and references), doubleâspaced in 12âpt. font. The paper should be formatted and referenced according to the manuscript preparation guidelines in the APA Publication Manual 6th ed. No abstract is needed. It is quite acceptable to integrate portions of earlier assignment(s) into this assignment.
Further info:
This paper is for you to think about moving policy into action and implementing and change. Like Assignment 2, I’m expecting you to do some analysis of the dimensions of the policy and context, etc.
The intent is for you to consider and think through the policy in light of particular context(s) in which the policy would be implemented and what may influence (or has already influenced) that implementation.
I’ve used the word “you” in the directions, perhaps more than needed. I’m not expecting you personally to move policy into action. You will be part of that movement though. So your writing should be in active voice and thinking about being part of the change.
You should not need to work in first person. This is not a personal essay. Please do not use Kouzes and Posner as your main reference for how to implement as a leader.
If you do choose to write about how you as a leader will work with the levers of change – etc., make sure you do not fall into “shoulds” or “musts” or “needs to” (see the Discussion posting from me on Assignment 2 follow-up)
For example, think about the who-what-where-when-how of implementing policy and go to the evidence around implementation on or uptake of your topic. This will likely be found in the research evidence, and/or evaluation documents.
Many of you looked at strategies and position papers as part of your analysis for Assignment 2. There is a lot of advice and recommendations in these documents on how to go forward with the particular issue and what policy is needed. But much of it is “acontextual”. The whole notion of “rolling out” suggests that there can be a policy formulated in one place (and time) and then just uncritically implemented in other places and situations. It would be important to think about that assumption.
You may want to include some of your analysis from Assignment 2 in this paper. Thatâs OK but Iâm expecting that it will be fully incorporated into this new argument and not just cut and pasted.
If you did write about policy in Assignment 2, youâll likely introduce the policy with a synopsis of the policy and its strengths and weaknesses in light of its implementation.
If you did not actually write about policy in Assignment 2, but rather just talked about the background, and some of the strategies and position papers, it will be critical to have a brief analysis of the policy itself in Assignment 3.
Sample Solution
Presentation Medications, grabbing, brutality, achievement. Normally it is the initial three words that should go together barring the fourth one, yet the world is an impossible to miss place where no measure of rationale or thinking can genuinely separate why apparently opposing things occur. Whatever degree accomplish these things cooperate and for what reason do they work to facilitate thoughts and objectives in spite of them being awful things in idea? The appropriate response is hard to discover as it lies in the immense grounds of Colombia where an association known as the FARC accomplished their objec Policy and Leadership tives in turning into a genuine ideological group by using kidnappings, blackmail, and the medication exchange to set their capacity. This particular case is somewhat extraordinary as rather than savagely ousting the administration as initially proposed, the FARC utilized their previously existing status of a guerilla to arrange harmony with the legisla Policy and Leadership ture and increase official acknowledgment while as yet applying their impact all through South America and the world by conveying the message that it is conceivable to pick up power regardless of whether the best approach to get it isn’t by lawful methods. That is the reason it is applicable, in light of the fact that in consummation one rough clash the entryways for other comparable gatherings who get their capacity by the equivalent unlawful methods open, and the complexities of the FARC’s case must be broke down so as to perceive any reason why they had the option to succeed and at last why it keeps on occurring. The huge Policy and Leadership , moving, green slopes of the Colombian field are home to a huge number of ranchers who make their living exclusively off the land, and it has been that route for a considerable length of time. The workers, whose land was claimed by ground-breaking oligarchs rebelled against them so as to oversee their fields. As time went on, radical reformists, socialist activists, and equipped workers shaped a ground-breaking 10,000 man armed force who might battle the administration so as to get equivalent possession for all. Because of the help from the extreme socialists and the belief system of equivalent possession, the civilian army fused Marxism/Leninism or in less difficult terms: socialism. At its center socialism is “a hypothesis for progressive change and political and financial association dependent on normal control of the methods for generation instead of private possession.” (Communism. (n.d.). Recovered from http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/section/Communism) which is actually the philosophy that the laborers received. After savagery and slaughter “nearly 43 guerrillas, ⦠had fled and taken asylum in the mountains of t Policy and Leadership he southwestern province of Cauca. Soon thereafter, they established the FARC in a similar zone.” (Molano, A. (2007, September 25). The Evolution of the FARC: A Guerrilla Groups Long History. Recovered from https://nacla.org/article/development farc-guerrilla-bunches long-history) prompting the enormous gathering that would at last keep on developing all the more dominant and would wind up prevailing in their objective because of their considerable size and apparently idealistic Policy and Leadership thought for Colombian, and to a more noteworthy degree the entirety of the worldwide, society. Because of the FARC being framed in the rustic zones of Colombia where destitution is across the board, they depended on anything that implies were dispensable to them. Because of their topographical and monetary circumstance they would have expected to go to whatever lengths important to develop financially which brought about their act of creating drugs because of the sheer measure of land they had available to them, they seized rich residents so as to get paid singular amounts of cash because of them having the deadly influence to do as such, and they blackmailed the ranchers who were living on the land by forcing charges on their yields. It is essential to dissect their tasks in advance as their quality developed and as a result of their broad control and power, the Colombian government made game plans with the FARC in 2016 through harmony agrees which made their political power real and perceived which would prompt them framing another gathering which would set their philosophy in stone and would be significant of how Colombian and at last worldwide legislative issues would work. Be that as it may, their previously existing impact in the zone may have prompted a vacuum in the area abandoning many fragment bunches who are endeavoring to pick up control for themselves as the FARC set a model for them to pursue. With a top to bottom investigation of their financial functions the FARC’s ascent to conspicuousness can be examined better as cash is at last the main impetus in any development particularly one that depends on weapons and huge systems of people. The manner in which the FARC completed their financial development can likewise give knowledge to their political belief system particularly since it bargains so vigorously with the monetary part of society nearly as much as the political angle. Normally, the legislative issues coming after their ascent to power is similarly as significant for what it’s worth through the legitimization of their capacity by the Colombian government that the FARC demonstrates a one of a kind case as in their eyes they have prevailing in their political crucial. The harmony arrangements likewise exhibit how pow Policy and Leadership erful the FARC is inside Colombia and it is through a political focal point of assessment that the FARC’s significance can be seen inside those archives as the arrangements made with the government reflect how significant having that association settled is. The two zones give a far reaching investigation of how the FARC rose to unmistakable quality and how significant and compelling they are politically which thus, gives a more clear perspective on how different gatherings are impacted by their strategies and shows how they intend to accomplish their objectives. Medications, Kidnapping, and Extortion The FARC at first developed in influence by means of the bootleg market because of their practices in controlling the medication exchange by coercion all through Colombia, just as grabbing affluent people whose payment would demonstrate liberal for the gathering monetarily; enabling them to be monetarily fit for keeping up and extending their capacity. Through military power the FARC vanquished worker farmland which they utilized deliberately. Their techniques worked so well that the FARC held “domains that create well over $1 billion dollars in criminal income consistently⦠” (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia â FARC) have verifiably been based on three columns: the medication exchange, hijacking, and extortion”(McDermott, J. (2018, February 21). The FARC’s Riches: Up to $580 Million in Annual Income. Recovered from https://www.insightcrime.org/news/investigation/farc-wealth yearly-salary up-to-580-million) which enabled them to have the option to support their central goal to develop their territory of control inside Colombia and apply their predominance over the individuals who lived in the spots which they involved. The legislature did at one point endeavor to make manages the FARC at an opportune time in their ascent to influence by closing down laborer cultivates that developed coca, the key fixing in the generation of cocaine which the FARC offered to profit, in any case, “The administration’s inability to sufficiently address illegal yield development adds to regular citizen backing of the guerrillas. Pilgrims in the region see the guerrillas as the main reaction to the a Policy and Leadership ssault on their lives and business through airborne fumigation of coca and poppy fields and legal procedures.” (Meza, R. V. (1999). The Revolutionary military of Colombia (FARC) and the unlawful medication exchange. Cochabamba, Bolivia: Acción Andina and so forth.). The administration’s closing down of worker coca cultivates that are constrained by the revolt show how the FARC was equipped for raising help all through the nation by the lower class and shows causation both for their association with the medication exchange and explanations behind their ascent to unmistakable quality as they had the option to effectively beaten the deterrents set up by the legislature as not exclusively did the administration neglect to stop the FARC’s unlawful exchange yet the FARC discovered that the Colombian government was practically no danger to them. Moreover, it additionally prompted “the FARC ‘recogniz[ing] harmony as a risk to the ‘authentic’ continuation of their battle’ and neglected to end its ‘capturing, extortion[,] and fear monger exercises’” (Hataway, B. (2015). The FARC’s Drug Trafficking as Political Crime: Determining the Success of Colombia’s Peace Talks. North Carolina Journal Of International Law and Commercial Regulation, 41(1), 163-188) which shows how the administration’s underlying endeavor settled flopped as well as rather made the FARC increasingly resolved to complete their demonstrations of fear mongering as they currently confronted proper resistance which called for them to become considerably more as they presently needed to earn bolster that was equipped for holding off the Colombian government. The disappointment brought about by the administration’s intercession made a difficult circumstance where “Individuals from the regular citizen populace are viewed as military targets since they are compelled to cover government obligations requested by the rebellion.” (Meza, R. V. (1999). The Revolutionary military of Colombia (FARC) and the illegal medication exchange. Cochabamba, Bolivia: Acción Andina and so for Policy and Leadershipth.) This additional to the FARC’s capacity as they turned out to be imperative to such an extent that the worker populace depended on them for money contrasted with the administration which couldn’t give the necessary assets. The complexities of their financial abuse by the FARC on the laborer populace attaches them straightforwardly to the medication exchange as “the guerrillas set the cost of coca paid by traders to little owners, in return for a toll of 7% to 10% on the closeout of their collect⦠.Concurrently, the FARC applied weight on ranchers with the goal that they would not keep themselves to coca creation alone, since 75% of the terrains were, in any event on a fundamental level, to be committed to subsistence agribusiness important to the guerrillas’ endurance.” (Labrousse, An., and Garcés, L. (2005). THE FARC AND THE TALIBAN’S CONNECTION TO DRUGS. Diary Of Drug Issues, 35(1), 169-184). Along these lines of getting pay shows how the FARC was adhering to their>