Play Proof Character Analysis

Read the play Proof, and then write an analysis of one of the characters. You may use the brainstorming questions below to generate ideas, or you may refer to the Week 3 discussion prompt for a refresher on ways character is revealed.

Description

By the due date assigned, submit your three-paragraph essay as a Microsoft Word attachment. You will complete this assignment using the play Proof on pp. 1181-1232 of Compact Literature.

Directions

Read the play Proof, and then write an analysis of one of the characters. You may use the brainstorming questions below to generate ideas, or you may refer to the Week 3 discussion prompt for a refresher on ways character is revealed.

For this assignment, develop a short essay of at least three paragraphs and 500 words. In your response, be sure that you have the following: an introductory paragraph with a clear thesis statement, at least one body paragraph with supporting reasons, examples, and quotations from the play, and a concluding paragraph. The thesis statement should be your main argument analyzing the character you have chosen. Use APA style for formatting the paper and for in-text citations and end references.

Brainstorming Questions

Select a character from Proof. What main emotion is the character experiencing? What does he or she want? What is the conflict this character encounters? How does he or she attempt to get this desire? What prevents him or her from achieving it? What is the resolution by the end of the play for this character? Does the character change by the end of the play? What point do you want to make about the character in your essay? Make notes, and develop a thesis statement with support.

Reminders

Use APA style, and include a title page, running header, proper font and spacing, in-text citations, and a separate references page.
Do not use any outside sources to complete this response; rely on your own insights.
Quoted material from the play should not exceed 25% of the essay.
You may exceed the minimum word and paragraph count.

Example APA Reference from the eBook
Auburn, D. (2016). Proof. In L.G. Kirszner & S.R. Mandell (Eds.), Compact Literature: Reading, Reacting, Writing [VitalSource digital version] (pp. 1081-1232). Boston: Cengage.

Play Proof

Sample Solution

 

Do we owe Japan a conciliatory sentiment for our choice to drop two nuclear bombs on their nation during World War II? Actually no, not really. The war was the absolute most expensive clash the American individuals had ever experienced. President Harry Truman’s choice to drop two nuclear bombs on Japan in the mid year of 1945 was an awful, yet important factor in consummation World War II. The bombs spared incalculable American lives and constrained Japan to give up, which finished three years, eight months, and 22 days of contention for the United States [8]. President Truman was answerable for the choice to drop the bombs, not to have them made. The bombs were eventually endorsed to be worked by Franklin Roosevelt. It was Roosevelt who initially found out about the new thoughts of atomic splitting and uranium to make bombs through extraordinary physicist and Nazi Germany displaced person, Albert Einstein. Einstein educated him regarding Nazi Germany’s arrangements with the new logical advancements, and how they were going to fabricate a bomb. Not the logical actualities, yet rather, the way that Germany was tying down their uranium and wanting to fabricate their very own bomb started Roosevelt’s advantage. After Germany assaulted Poland and world War II had formally started, the race to fabricate the bomb resulted. American, British, and German researchers were all attempting to logically demonstrate Einstein’s thoughts, and to manufacture plans for the bomb. The British researchers wound up finding the method first, and imparted their discoveries to the American researchers. Soon after Japan’s assault on Pearl Harbor and Germany announcing war with America, Franklin Roosevelt gave the Play Proof  requests to fabricate the bomb [4]. By 1945, it was obvious to both America and Japan that Japan would not win the war. American pioneers realized that regardless of the chances, Japanese troopers would keep on versatilely shield themselves against the United States, as give up was fainthearted and disreputable in Japanese culture. We saw the Japanese speak to this  Play Proof social characteristic prior in the war during the fight on Iwo Jima, where they kept on battling until nearly their last officer. Just 200 of the 21,000 Japanese soldiers were taken prisoner by American Marines [1]. Japan battled and lost a lot more lives when they were totally crushed by America. They were set up to never give up in future battle during the war. A less-wanted answer for achieve the finish of the war was the last attack of Japan by American warriors to drive their give up. The issue with this arrangement was that it would achieve a disastrous number of setbacks to the American powers. President Truman was not partial to this endeavor. He said that it would be justified, despite all the trouble to forestall the “a large number of American soldiers that would be murdered in attackin Play Proof g Japan” [10]. Then again, Army Chief of Staff, George C. Marshall, contended that an intrusion would end the war more clearly and rapidly than different choices [7]. These statements show a portion of the debate that occurred between government pioneers while settling on the choice. Nobody was truly in agreement. In 2018, there are a lot more individuals that accept the bombs were pointless and the choice to drop them was supremacist and pitiless. There are solid contentions for and against Truman’s choice, yet before anybody can settle on an authentic choice, they initially should consider what the occasions resembled during the war. One contention is that the main reasons were to underscore political predominance and keep the Soviet Union under control. This contention makes some sense, as America was stressed over the Soviet Union’s utilization of atomic weapons during the war. Dropping the bombs demonstrated them the mass obliteration their weapons were fit for when utilized in fight, which made them reexamine their utilization of atomic weapons. The piece of this contention about political strength is honestly a superfluous factor when discussing the choice to drop the bombs. President Truman was looked with either losing increasingly American lives or completion the war r Play Proof apidly. It isn’t obvious that there were numerous musings of predominance, as he was concentrating on reestablishing America’s spirit [2]. In any case, was the choice to drop a demonstration of bigotry? Would the United States have dropped the bomb on Germany? Truly, they would have. It might resemble a demonstration of prejudice to the Japanese in light of the fact that the United States didn’t drop the bombs on Germany, in spite of America’s “Germany first” methodology all through the war. In the event that the bombs were fit to be utilized, America undoubtedly would have utilized them against Nazi Germany. They were not fit to be utilized until after Play Proof  the Nazi’s give up. The main trial of our atomic weapons didn’t occur until two months after the Nazi give up [6]. After some time, Japan was debilitated by persevering assaults from American powers. The United States basically assaulted Japan from the air, dropping many fire bombs, which burned urban areas underneath. Prior to the nuclear bombs, the United States had likewise encompassed Japan and remove all ocean traffic coming or leaving the nation. These two elements sent Japan into a genuine monetary and legislative emergency. It might appear as though the steady bombings and disconnection of Japan would constrain them to give up, however they were all the while maintaining their social qualities and accepted give up was impossible. Their military powers were as yet unblemished and prepared to oppose the US attack. It did not merit the loss of American lives to take out each and every Japanese warrior and win the war [9]. Japan was a vanquished country by the late spring of 1945. The nation had lost about the entirety of its populace because of the bombings of their city and starvation. Right up ’til the present time, there isn’t a certain clarification to why Japan gave up, however they undoubtedly would not have promptly given up if not for the bombs. In Louis Morton’s book, The Decision To Use The Atomic Bomb, he expresses, “Regardless of whether air siege and maritime barricade or the danger of attack would have d Play Proof elivered an early give up and deflected the substantial misfortunes practically sure to go with the real arrivals in Japan is a debatable inquiry. Positively they profoundly affected the Japanese position. It is similarly hard to state completely that the nuclear bomb alone or Soviet mediation alone was the unequivocal factor in finishing the war” (Morton 518) [5]. This statement strengthens the way that it’s difficult to discern whether the bombarding was vital, yet it unquestionably accelerated the finish of the war. Morton clarifies that it’s additionally difficult to determine what truly finished the war; it appears as though it was the iota shelling, however it could have been dangers from Soviet Russia or the detachment and innumerable bombings of Japan. The choice to drop the bombs may appear to be coldhearted. Americans and the associated powers considered Japanese to be as substandard and subhuman. President Truman even called them “monsters”. So how was it alright to drop the bombs on Japan out of scorn for their race? The view of what prejudice implies has radically changed since the 1940’s, yet America certainly had a couple of huge motivations to detest the Japanese individuals. Japan began the contention with America themselves by bombarding Pearl Harbor and murdering 3000 Americans. Also, the cases of the bombings being coldhearted and remorseless don’t bode well when one takes a gander at Japan’s dull past. Those cases infer that Japan is the essential unfortunate casualty. This isn’t correct on the grounds that the Japanese were likewise merciless to Americans. They lead passing walks and executed numerouPlay Proofs American detainees. Japan had additionally murdered a huge number of regular folks during the war. They are hated by China, K Play Proof orea, and other Asian Countries for the bombings and slaughters they submitted in the war. They accepted that they were over all other Asian Countries, which advocated their rough conduct. They had a comparative outlook to Nazi Germany, and accepted that Japanese individuals were the ace Nationality [3]. By and large, America was certainly legitimized in their choice to drop two nuclear bombs on Japan to end World War II. The horrifying impacts of the bombs indicated the remainder of the world what th Play Proofe bombs were prepared to do, which helped a few countries rule against utilizing atomic weapons. On the off chance that one can look past the obliteration the bombs caused in Japan, one can plainly observe that it was just the most judicious decision to end the war. The bombs spared American lives, finished the expensive and bleeding war, and shielded the vast  Play Proofmajority of the world from going to atomic fighting. In the event that it were not for the dropping of the bombs, the Soviet Union and other incredible countries would have proceeded with their atomic plans and potentially transformed the whole world into an atomic no man’s land.>

Is this question part of your Assignment?

We can help

Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.

We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals

Header Button Label: Get Started NowGet Started Header Button Label: View writing samplesView writing samples