head of people that exist today. Obviously, Nick Bostrom’s contention doesn’t express that we are living in a reenactment, he gives us three choices. The primary alternative cl Philosophy and something from pop culture arifies that people will wind up wiped out before we arrive at a posthuman organize. This considering human instinct is the probably of the three. Indeed, mathematician Dr Fergus Simpson [2] predicts that there is a 0.2% shot of a “worldwide disaster” happening at whatever year  Philosophy and something from pop culturethrough the span of the 21st Century. The subsequent choice suggests that any posthuman civilisation would be incredibly improbable to run countless recreations of their transformative history (or varieties of). This is the second undoubtedly choice because of how explicit the reproduction contention is, there is constantly an enormous possibility that as the choice expresses the posthumans could just “not do it”, basically (I really expound later in the paper). This choice additionally has a fascinating point that any posthuman civilisation could be the one to make or for this situation not make the reenactment. On the off chance that the idea of the reenactment is to reproduce an entire universe, at that point we could be included as projects whether human relatives make it, or some other outsider recreation would make it. The third alternative owns a serious strong expression that we are in fact living in a PC recreation, to clarify why this announcement is consistently right I should propose Philosophy and something from pop culture  a scientific look to it utilizing likelihood. On the off chance that we could envision that a posthuman stag Philosophy and something from pop culture e is come to, and they did in actuality choose to make a reproduction of their predecessors (us), at that point who is stating that we or they are in certainty the organic unique. On the off chance that a recreation of this size is achievable and in the event that it has occurred, at that point possibly it would happen once more, perhaps commonly, however in the event that every one of these reproductions where brought forth inside different reenactments, at that point there could be a fantastically huge number of reproductions. In the event that this is along these lines, at that point the odds of us being the first are very thin and in this manner it is sheltered to accept (if the first two have not met) we are in reality living in reenactment. I will investigate this point further later in the paper. The Assumption of Substrate-Independence On the off chance that we need a PC reproduction to process a Philosophy and something from pop culture  human’s psy Philosophy and something from pop culture che down to an ideal detail and for every individual in the recreation to genuinely be their own intellectual individual then we need a Substrate-Independent personality. This is the possibility that our brains are not constrained to just bei>