Order Description
Oral Presentation (15%)
Length: 5 minute presentation (write up 5 min presentation paper words for the case study)

Briefing Paper (5%)
700 word maximum
Word (or similar) digital document.
Your document should be formatted with 1.5 line spacing.
You should include the ECU Cover Sheet at the start of your submission.
HST2184 Assessment 2: Case Study Presentation – Marking Criteria – 2016
Student Name: Mark: /20
Criteria High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Presentation Skills 3.0 – 2.4 2.3 – 2.1 2.2 – 1.8 1.7 – 1.5 1.4 – 0
– Tone, pace, clarity of speaking and confidence A very confident and
well-rehearsed presentation, well-paced and clear, demonstrating high levels of professionalism and enthusiasm. A well-rehearsed presentation, well-paced and clear, demonstrating appropriate levels of professionalism and enthusiasm. A professional presentation, with good pacing and clarity in the voice narration. Your presentation skills are developing well. It would be beneficial to rehearse your narration prior to recording and increase your enthusiasm. Keep practicing to improve presentation skills. Your presentation would benefit from more rehearsal and confidence with your narration.
Communication Skills 4.0 – 3.2 3.1 – 2.8 2.7 – 2.4 2.3 – 2.0 1.9 – 0
– Targets appropriate audience – type of language, relevant examples Language is free of jargon and acronyms. Highly relevant examples. Language is mainly free of jargon and acronyms. Very relevant examples. Language includes some use of jargon and acronyms. Relevant examples. Some unclear phrasing and frequent use of jargon and/or acronyms. Examples given. Language is not suitable for use in a community seminar setting. Unclear and/or excessive use of jargon and/or acronyms.
– Engaging creative, visual appeal (especially slides) Excellent effort to create a presentation creative and engaging for audience. Good balance of text and images. Strong effort to create a presentation creative and engaging for audience. Good balance of text and images. Good effort to create a presentation creative and engaging for audience. Some images to balance use of text. Some effort to create a presentation creative and engaging for audience. Frequent use of long strings of text, limited use of images. There is no or little effort to make presentation creative and engaging for audience. Few or no images were provided. Large blocks of text used on slides.
Disease summary 3.0 – 2.4 2.3 – 2.1 2.2 – 1.8 1.7 – 1.5 1.4 – 0
– Overview of mumps, include description and current disease rates Excellent structure and evidence of extensive research. You have a high level of understanding of the aetiology and current disease rate. Very good structure and evidence of research. Evidence of a good level of understanding of the aetiology and current disease rate. Good structure and evidence of some research. Evidence of a sound understanding of the aetiology and current disease rate. Acceptable structure and evidence of limited research. Evidence of a basic understanding of the aetiology and current disease rate. Poor presentation which lacks structure. Insufficient evidence of an understanding of the aetiology and current disease rate.
Vaccination Issues 4.0 – 3.2 3.1 – 2.8 2.7 – 2.4 2.3 – 2.0 1.9 – 0
– Vaccination schedule and herd immunity An excellent demonstration of herd immunity and a thorough explanation of the vaccination schedule. A very good demonstration of herd immunity and a good explanation of the vaccination schedule. A good demonstration of herd immunity and explanation of the vaccination schedule. A demonstration of herd immunity and some explanation of the vaccination schedule. Some required content was missing, incorrect or unclear.
– Common community concerns Comprehensive explanation of the issues related to vaccine preventable diseases and addresses common community concerns convincingly. Detailed explanation of the issues related to vaccine preventable diseases and addresses many common community concerns. Good explanation of the issues related to vaccine preventable diseases and addresses some common community concerns. Basic explanation of the issues related to vaccine preventable diseases and addresses a limited number common community concerns. Limited or no explanation of the issues related to vaccine preventable diseases and fails to address any common community concerns.
Briefing Paper; disease description, outbreak significance, notification requirements, control and exclusion requirements. 5 – 4.25 4.25 – 3.75 3.75 – 3.25 3.25 – 2.5 2.5 – 0
Comprehensive discussion of the disease and control requirements, conclusions and recommendation for controlling the risks. Clear-cut discussion of the disease and control requirements, conclusions and recommendation for controlling the risks. Clear discussion of the disease and control requirements, conclusions and recommendation for controlling the risks. Discussion of the disease and control requirements, conclusions and recommendation for controlling the risks. Brief or limited of the disease and control requirements, conclusions and recommendation for controlling the risks.
Referencing & citing of information sources 1.0 – 0.8 0.8 -0.7 0.7 – 0.6 0.6 – 0.5 0.5 – 0
Excellent skill in the correct referencing style in presentations and papers; direct quotations used very sparingly. Good skill in the correct referencing style for use in presentations and papers; direct quotations used sparingly. Demonstrated skill in the correct referencing style for use in presentations and papers; direct quotations used sparingly. Some inaccuracies in the correct referencing style for use in presentations and papers; direct quotations used frequently. Referencing insufficient or inaccurate for use in presentations and papers; direct quotations over-used and/or cited incorrectly.