Read Laporte v The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2014] EWHC 3574 (QB) and Laporte v The Commissioner for the Police of the Metropolis [2015] EWHC 371 (QB) and answer ALL PARTS of the following question:

a) Summarise the facts and legal arguments in Laporte v The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2014] EWHC 3574 (QB)
b) What were the decisions reached in both the original trial and the subsequent costs hearing?

c) In Laporte v The Commissioner for the Police of the Metropolis [2015] EWHC 371 (QB) Mr Justice Turner found guidance from three previous cases which were heard in the Court of Appeal. What were these cases and how were they applied?

d) In relation to admissible evidence, what practical difficulties did Mr Justice Turner face in Laporte v The Commissioner for the Police of the Metropolis [2014] EWHC 3547 (QB)?

In your answer you should refer to relevant authorities, including cases, statutes and, where appropriate, the views of academics, ensuring that they are fully referenced, using OSCOLA.

d) In relation to admissible evidence, what practical difficulties did Mr Justice Turner face in Laporte v The Commissioner for the Police of the Metropolis [2014] EWHC 3547 (QB)?
Looking for the best essay writer? Click below to have a customized paper written as per your requirements.