Suppose someone argues for relativism like this: People have different beliefs. People disagree about how old the world is; whether there is life on other planets; and even whether Bigfoot exists. So there’s really no truth about how old the world is; whether there’s life on other planets; or even whether Bigfoot exists. Use the arguments from James Rachels to evaluate the force of this argument.

First, construct a good introductory paragraph that identifies what your paper will attempt to accomplish.

Then just paste the argument I presented in your paper.

Employ James Rachels’s discussion to evalute the argument. Conclude by telling me how the reader should see the argument in the prompt. Is it a good argument? Is Rachels right?