By its very nature, the role of public administrator means carrying a fair share of responsibility. In both government and nonprofit organizations, administrators may be responsible for budgets, staff, and project outcomes, for example. Throughout this course, you explore ethics in public administration. As a public administrator, how might you balance the objective and subjective aspects of responsibility with both your organization’s ethical standards and your own? In order to discover this balance, you will begin by examining the fundamental relationship between ethics and professional responsibility.
In this Discussion, in your reading you review a case study: “When a Career Public Servant Sues the Agency He Loves: Claude Ferguson, the Forest Service, and Off-Road Vehicles in the Hoosier National Forest” (O’Leary, 2009) and consider how a public administrator might balance the objective, subjective, and ethical responsibilities within a governmental agency or nonprofit organization.
Post by Day 3 a brief explanation of the relationship between ethics and professional responsibility. Then, explain whether you agree or disagree with the way that Claude Ferguson chose to balance his objective, subjective, and ethical responsibilities as a public administrator given the personal and professional risks. Finally, offer an alternate strategy that Claude Ferguson could have taken and explain why it might help him to balance responsibilities and ethics.
Or,
Post by Day 3, Explain what you think is the balance and relationship between ethics and professional responsibility for human service professionals. Discuss an example similar to the Claude Ferguson case study that is provided in the Learning Resources (O’Leary, R. 2009). Explain why you agree or disagree with the way that the human services employeechose to balance his or her objective, subjective, ethics, and professional responsibilities given the personal and professional risks. If there is an alternative action you would have taken, explain why.