Finance 210
Group Case Analysis
Dr. Samer Saade
Done By:
Laian Hammoud
Leen Kurbah
Anas Rihawi
Mona Zahran
Introduction:
Amazon Vs Ebay
Amazon is an American multinational electronic commerce company. It started as an online bookstore, however after some time it grew much larger to an extent where it diverged and started selling all sort of things. Amazon now sells electronics, software, furniture, jewelry, toys, as well as food. It is the largest online retailer in the world, which is why we chose to assess Amazon’s financial position. It was founded in 1994, by Jeff Bezos who is current the Chairman, President, and CEO. Moreover, its shares are traded on NASDAQ under the ticker AMZN.
EBay, which is Amazon’s top competitor, is also an American multinational electronic commerce company. The feature which makes eBay unique is the “online auction” which it does every once and a while, which caused people to buy things on the spot rather than taking the time to think about the deal. It was founded in 1995, by Pierre Omidyar who is the current chairman. Its shares are also traded on NASDAQ just like Amazon under the ticker eBay. Two of its popular slogans include:
“Buy it New, Buy it Now” “When it’s on your mind, it’s on eBay |
Vs.
Short Term Solvency Ratios:
Amazon EBAY
Ratio | Formula | 2010 | 2011 | 2011 |
Current Ratio | CA/CL | 1.325 | 1.174 | 1.8 |
Quick Ratio | (CA-Inventory)/CL | 1.01 | 0.83 | 1.8 |
Cash Ratio | Cash/CL | 0.84 | 0.64 | 0.88 |
NWC to Total Assets | NWC/TA | 0.179 | 0.10 | 0.4 |
Amazon had its liabilities covered 1.325 times in 2010. Since the ratio is greater than 1.2, Amazon was quiet liquid in 2010. Comparing the 2010 figures to that of 2011, the current ratio dropped to 1.17 indicating that Amazon covered its liabilities 1.17 times in 2011. On the other hand, EBay’s current ratio in 2011 is 1.8 indicating that EBay is more liquid than Amazon in the same year. EBay’s liabilities are covered 1.8 times over.
Note that we cannot compare the quick ratio of Amazon to that of EBay considering the fact that the financial statements of eBay report 0 Inventory. Comparing the quick ratio of Amazon in 2010 to that of 2011, we notice a decrease in the quick ratio and an increase in inventory. Having a look at the financial statements, Amazon’s inventory increased by approximately 4,000.
The cash ratio significantly indicates that Amazon has more cash and cash equivalents on hand to pay of its current debt in 2010 than in 2011. EBay on the other hand has more cash and cash equivalents on hand to pay of its current liabilities than Amazon. EBay is managing its cash on hand in a good way in comparison to Amazon.
The net working capital to total assets reveals a similar story. Amazon’s ratio in 2010 was quiet low indicating low levels of liquidity (0.179) and this value drop to even a lower level in 2011 (0.1). In comparison to EBay, EBay seems to report a higher ratio in comparison to Amazon but at the same time the ratio is quiet low.
Vs.
Profitability Ratios:
Amazon EBAY
Ratio | Formula | 2010 | 2011 | 2011 |
ROA | NI/TA | 0.06 | 0.024 | 0.11 |
ROE | NI/TE | 0.167 | 0.0813 | 0.18 |
Profit Margin | NI/Sales | 3.36% | 1.312% | 27% |
It is clear that Amazon has suffered a bit during the year of 2011. Its Profit margin declined from 3.36% to 1.31%. The data shows a decline in the net income rather than a decline in sales. This is the reason behind the decrease in Amazon’s profit margin. Whereas for EBay, its profit margin indicates that for every dollar in sales generates about 27 cents in profit. This indicates that when it comes to generating profit EBay is more successful than Amazon. A high profit margin is desirable.
The second ratio is the Return on Assets ratio, which is a measure of profit per dollar of assets. Comparing the ratios, it is obvious that there is a decline in the return on assets. In 2010, Amazon reported a 6% return on asset indicating that 1$ in assets generates 6 cents in profit which is relatively high compared to that of 2011 where 1 $ of Amazon’s assets generated about 2.4 cents. Amazon seems to have had some sort of backlash during the year of 2011. EBay on the other hand, was successful in maintaining a high return on asset where it reported a return on asset of 0.11 during the year of 2011 indicating that 1$ of assets generates a little more than 10 cents in profit.
Same story for the ROE! The ROE is a measure of the profit per 1 $ of equity. EBay reported a higher ROE than Amazon in both years, and Amazon reported a lower ROE in year 2011 compared to year 2010. The data shows that Amazon’s total shareholder’s equity increased from year 2010 to 2011, this is probably the reason why the ROE is lower in year 2011 than that of year 2010.
Vs.
Market Value Measures:
Amazon EBAY
2010 | 2011 | 2011 | |
Number of Outstanding Shares | 451 | 455 | 1,286,487 |
Close Price | 180 | 173.10 | 30.33 |
EPS=NI/NOS | 2.554 | 1.386 | 0.00251 |
PE ratio=Price per share/EPS | 70.4 | 124.89 | 12,083 |
Market to book Value=MV per share/BV per share | 11.82 | 10.15 | 2,176.2 |
Price Earnings Ratio is a good measure of how investors are willing to pay per dollar of current earnings. Amazon’s PE ratio increased during the two years.The Market-to book value ratio compares the market value of the firm’s investment to their cost. A market to book value ratio less than 1 indicates that the firm did not succeed in creating value for its stockholders which is a corporation’s main goal. Amazon and EBay both succeeded in creating a value for their shareholders by maintaining a market to book value ratio greater than 1. Comparing the two companies when it comes to market value may be a bit hard, considering the fact that the two are significantly different when it comes to the price and the number of outstanding shares.
Vs.
Long-term solvency ratios:
Ratio | Formula | 2010 | 2011 | 2011 |
Total-debt ratio | TD/TA | 0.634 | 0.69 | 0.34 |
Debt-equity ratio | TD/TE | 1.738 | 2.258 | 0.52 |
Equity Multiplier | TA/TE | 2.73 | 3.25 | 1.52 |
Long-Term Debt Ratio | LTD/(LTD+TE) | 0.085 | 0.15 | 0.078 |
Times Interest earned ratio | EBIT/Interest | 39.5 | 15.18 | 157.2144 |
Cash Coverage | (EBIT+Depreciation)/Interest | 56.4 | 45.2 | 194.7674 |
Total debt ratio is a ratio that explains how much total liabilities are within a company as a ratio of total assets. It defines how much a company owes its creditors. The total debt ratio for Amazon increases from 0.634 in 2010 to 0.69 in 2011. This can be interpreted as, in 2010 for every 1$ in assets, Amazon uses approximately 63 cents debt whereas in 2011 Amazon uses approximately 69 cents of debt for every 1$ in assets. This increase is approximately an 8% increase in the use of debt from 2010 to 2011. The total debt ratio for EBay is 0.34 in 2011. This may be interpreted as, for every 1$ in total assets, eBay uses 34 cents in debt. This is sufficiently less than that of its competitor Amazon by 0.35 less.
The Debt to equity ratio is another debt management ratio. Amazon’s debt to equity ratio increased from 1.738 in 2010 to 2.258 in 2011. In 2010, every 1$ of equity Amazon used 1.738 $ of debt similarly in 2011, Amazon used 2.258$ of debt for every 1$ of equity. Since in both years the ratio is greater than 1, this indicated that financing by debt is greater than financing by equity, and the increase in the ratio is due to an increase in in debt from 11,933 to 17,521 which is a significant increase. EBay on the other hand succeeded in maintaining a debt to equity ratio less than 1 indicating that financing by equity is much greater than financing by debt. (0.52)
The Long term debt ratio reveals as well an increase for Amazon from 0.085(2010) to 0.15(2011) .The important significance of the LTD ratio is when compared to the total debt ratio one can indicate whether the company relies on long term debt or short term debt. In 2011, Amazon relies more on long-term debt compared to 2011. EBay, on the other hand seems to rely less on long term debt and probably more on short term debt since it reports a low LTD ratio(0.078) Having a look at the financial statements EBay has 1,525.047 only in Long term debt which is relatively way less than the sum of the current(short-term liabilities) of EBay.
The Time Interest Earned and the Cash Coverage ratio are similar. The TIE is one ratio that is used to persuade creditors to have more access to loans (more borrowing). It indicates the capacity to borrow and pay interest. Amazon’s TIE ratio decreased from 2010 to 2011 to almost half, indicating some trouble in covering the interest bill. On the other hand, EBay’s TIE ratio is significantly larger than Amazon’s which indicates that EBay might be able to persuade creditors to borrow more than Amazon. The Cash Coverage ratio is an indication of the firm’s ability to generate cash flows from operations, EBay in 2011 excels in generating cash from operations reporting a significantly high Cash coverage ratio in comparison to that of Amazon in both years, and as the rest of the data and ratios indicate the cash coverage of amazon declined from 2010 to 2011.
Vs.
Asset Management Ratios:
Ratio | Formula | 2010 | 2011 | 2011 |
Inventory Turnover | COGS/SALES | 8.12 times | 7.269 times | No Inventory |
Days’ Sales in Inventory | 365/Inventory Turnover | 45 days | 49 days | No Inventory |
Receivables’ Turnover | Sales/AR | 25.83 | 22.5 | 1.88 |
Days’ Sales in Receivables | 365/Receivables’ Turnover | 14 days | 16 days | 194 days |
NWC Turnover | Sales/NWC | 10.1 times | 18.534 times | 1.96 times |
Fixed Assets Turnover | Sales/NFA | 14.16 times | 10.884 times | 5.8 times |
Total Asset Turnover | Sales/TA | 1.81 times | 1.89 times | 0.42 times |
Note that we cannot compare Amazon and EBay when it comes to Inventory Turnover and Days’ Sale in Inventory because the data indicates a zero level of inventory. There’s a small increase in the inventory turnover of Amazon from 2010(8.12 times) to 7.269 times in 2011. This indicates that in 2010 Amazon Inc. turned its inventory approximately 8.24 times whereas in 2011 Amazon sold off its entire inventory 7.296 times. A high inventory turnover ratio indicates that we are managing our inventory more efficiently. The Days’ Sales of inventory indicates an increase from 45 days to 49 days, instead of sitting 45 days before its sold, inventory now sits a little less than 50 days before it is sold.
Receivable turnover is another asset management ratio. Amazon’s receivable turnover decreased from 2010(25.83) indicating that Amazon collected and reloaned money 25.83 times to 22.5 in 2011 where Amazon was able to collect and reloan money about 22.5 . However, EBay’s receivable turnover is quite low (1.88). A low receivable turnover indicates weakness of a company unless the company intentionally extends credit to its customers for a longer period of time perhaps to gain some sort of competitive advantage. The reason probably EBay reports a low Receivable is due to the low level of sales in comparison to the Amazon. The Day’s Sale of Receivable indicates that Amazon collects on its credit sales in 14 days which increased to 19 days in 2011. As for EBay the average collection period is 194 days which indicates that EBay collects on its credit sales in 194 days. It is quite high; a low days’ sales receivable is desirable. A high day’ sales of receivables indicate doubtful accounts or lenient collection of accounts receivables.
We turn to the total asset turnover. Amazon’s total asset turnover increased from 1.81 (2010) to 1.89(2011). In 2010, every 1$in asset was able to generate1.81$ in sales, a slight increase in the total asset turnover ratio, in 2011 every 1$in asset generated. Taking a look at the financial statements we notice that the sales increased by almost 13,873 $. EBay on the other hand is able to generate in 2011 approximately 0.42 $ (42 cents) in 1$ of assets. We notice that the sales of Amazon are approximately equal to 4 times the sales of EBay. Amazon is successful in generating sales more than EBay.
Recommendations:
- Short term solvency:
As seen above, the current ratio fell from 1.32to 1.17. As the current ratio fell to a value below 1.2, Amazon may consider managing its current liabilities. It may do so by limiting dependence on account payables and other short term debt. Furthermore, the quick ratio mirror imaged the current ratio and declined from 1 to 0.8. This suggests that Amazon’s dependence on inventory may be limited by using other forms of production processes (just in time production or cross docking). By managing the inventory levels, other aspects of the company will also be ameliorated such as the inventory turnover and the day’s sales in inventory.
- Profitability:
Amazon’s profit margin decreased from 3.2% to 1.3% from year 2010 to 2010 indicating that the Net income (profit) decreased from year 2010 to year 2011. It should consider managing its expenses such as cost of goods sold (increase in Cogs), interest expense, and sundry expenses.
- Long term solvency ratio:
The total Debt ratio shows that Amazon relies on debt considering that the total debt ratio increased in 2011. When comparing the Total debt ratio to the long term debt ratio, we conclude that Amazon relies on short term debt which is relatively more expensive than relying on long term debt where short term debt bears an interest that might reach 30% of the debt’s face value.
Appendix A
Amazon:
Formula | 2010 | 2011 | |
1.Profitability Measures: | |||
Return on Assets | NI/TA | (1,152/18,797)*100
=6.13% |
(631/25,278)*100
=2.49% |
Return on Equity | NI/TE | (1,152/6,864)*100
=16.78% |
(631/7,757)*100
=8.13% |
Profit Margin | NI/SALES | (1,152/34,204)*100
=3.36% |
(631/48,077)*100
=1.31% |
2.Asset Management Ratio: | |||
Inventory Turnover | COGS/Inventory | 26,009/3,202
=8.12 times |
36,288/4,922
=7.27 times |
Days’ Sales in Inventory | 365/Inventory Turnover | 365/8.12
=50 days |
365/7.27
=50 days |
Receivables’ Turnover | Sales/AR | 34204/1,324
=25.83 times |
48,077/2,134
=22.53 times |
Days’ Sales in Receivables | 365/Receivables’ Turnover | 365/25.83
=14 days |
365/22.53
=16 days |
NWC Turnover | Sales/NWC | 34,204/(13,747-10,372)
=10.13 times |
48,077/(17.490-14,896)
=18.53 times |
Fixed Assets Turnover | Sales/NFA | 34,204/2,414
=14.16 times |
48,077/4,417
=10.88 times |
Total Asset Turnover | Sales/TA | 34,204/18,797
=1.81 times |
48,077/25,278
=1.89 times |
3.Short-term solvency ratios: | |||
Current Ratio | CA/CL | 13.747/10,372
=1.33 |
17,490/14,896
=1.17 |
Quick Ratio | (CA-Inventory)/CL | (13,747-3,202)/10,372
=1.01 |
(17,490-4,992)/14,896
=0.83 |
Cash Ratio | Cash/CL | 8,762/10,372
=0.84 |
9,576/14,896
=0.64 |
NWC to Total Assets | NWC/TA | 3,375/18,797
=0.18 |
2,594/25,278
=0.10 |
Interval Measure | CA/Average daily operating expenses | 13,747/{(1,152+657+39)/365}
=193 days |
17,490/{(631+65+1,149)/365}
=3463.37 days |
4.Long-term Solvency ratios: | |||
Total-debt ratio | TD/TA | 11,933/18,797
=0.63 |
17,521/25,278
=0.69 |
Debt-equity ratio | TD/TE | 11,933/6,864
=1.74 |
17,521/7,757
=2.26 |
Equity Multiplier | TA/TE | 18,797/6,864
=2.73 |
25,278/7,757
=3.25 |
Long-Term Debt Ratio | LTD/(LTD+TE) | 641/(641+6,864)
=0.085 |
1,415/(1,415+7,757)
=0.15 |
Times Interest earned ratio | EBIT/Interest | (1,504+39)/39
=39.56 |
(922+65)/65
=15.18 |
Cash Coverage | (EBIT+Depreciation)/Interest | (1,504+39+657)/39
=56.49 |
(922+65+1,149)/65
45.2 |
5.Market Value Ratios: | |||
Number of outstanding shares | 451 | 455 | |
Close Price | 180 | 173.10 | |
Price Sales Ratio | Price per share/sales per share | 180/(34,204/451)
=2.37 |
173.10/(48,077/455)
=1.64 |
PE Ratio | Price per share/earnings per share | 180/(1,152/451)
=70.5 |
173.10/(631/455)
=124.82 |
Market to book value | MV per share/BV per share | 180/(6,864/451)
=11.8 |
173.10/(7,757/455)
=10.15 |
EBay:
1.Profitability Measures: | Formula | 2011 | |
Return on Assets | NI/TA | 3,229.387/27,320.218
=0.11 |
|
Return on Equity | NI/TE | 3,229.387/17,929.879
=0.18 |
|
Profit Margin | NI/SALES | 3,229.387/11,651.654
=0.27 |
|
2.Asset Management Ratios: | |||
Inventory Turnover | COGS/INVENTORY | No Inventory | |
Days’ Sales in Inventory | 365/Inventory turnover | No Inventory | |
Receivables’ Turnover | Sales/AR | 11,651.654/6,195.280
=1.88 |
|
Days’ Sales in Receivables | 365/Receivables’ turnover | 365/1.88
=194 days |
|
NWC Turnover | Sales/NWC | 11,651.654/5,927.25
=1.96 times |
|
Fixed Assets Turnover | Sales/NFA | 11,651.654/
=5.8 times |
|
Total Asset Turnover | Sales/TA | 11,651.654/27,320.218
=0.42 times |
|
3.Short-term solvency ratios: | |||
Current Ratio | CA/CL | 12,661.454/6,734.204
=1.8 |
|
Quick Ratio | (CA-Inventory)/CL | (12,661.454-0)/6,734.204
=1.8 |
|
Cash Ratio | Cash/CL | 5,929.402/6,734.204
=0.88 |
|
NWC to Total Assets | NWC/TA | 5,927.25/27,320.218
=0.4 |
|
Interval Measure | CA/Average daily operating expenses | 12,661.454/{(3,229.387+25.03+939.953)/365}
=1101.82 days |
|
Long-term Solvency ratios: | |||
Total-debt ratio | TD/TA | 9,390.339/27,320.218
=0.34 |
|
Debt-equity ratio | TD/TE | 9,390.339/17,929.879
=0.52 |
|
Equity Multiplier | TA/TE | 27,320.218/17,929.879
= 1.52 |
|
Long-Term Debt Ratio | LTD/(LTD+TE) | 1,525.047/(1,525.047+17,929.879)
=0.078 |
|
Times Interest earned ratio | EBIT/INTEREST | (3,910.046+25.03)/25.03
=157.21 |
|
Cash Coverage | (EBIT+Depreciation)/Interest | (3,910.046+25.03+939.953)/25.03
=194.77 |
|
Market Value Ratios: | |||
Number of outstanding shares | 1,286,487 | ||
Close Price | 30.33 | ||
Price Sales Ratio | Price per share/sales per share | 30.33/(11,651.654/1,286,487)
=3.35 |
|
PE Ratio | Price per share/earnings per share | 30.33/(3,229.387/1,286,487)
=12.09 |
|
Market to book value | MV per share/BV per share | 30.33/(17,929.879/1,286,487)
=2.18 |
Appendix B
Name: EBay Inc. | ||||||||
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION | ||||||||
Fiscal Year: | 2011 | 2012 | ||||||
(FYR Ending): | (31DEC2011 ) | ( N/A ) | ||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Cash & Equivalents | 5,929.402 | |||||||
Receivables – Total (Net) | 6,195.280 | |||||||
Inventories – Total | .000 | |||||||
Prepaid Expenses | 169.491 | |||||||
Current Assets – Other | 367.281 | |||||||
Current Assets – Total | 12,661.454 | |||||||
Plant, Property & Equip (Gross) | 4,876.782 | |||||||
Accumulated Depreciation | 2,890.566 | |||||||
Plant, Property & Equip (Net) | 1,986.216 | |||||||
Investments at Equity | ||||||||
Investments and Advances – Other | 2,451.421 | |||||||
Intangibles | 9,771.369 | |||||||
Deferred Charges | ||||||||
Assets – Other | 449.758 | |||||||
TOTAL ASSETS | 27,320.218 | |||||||
LIABILITIES | ||||||||
Accounts Payable | 4,250.652 | |||||||
Notes Payable | 550.000 | |||||||
Accrued Expenses | 977.018 | |||||||
Taxes Payable | 297.686 | |||||||
Debt (Long-Term) Due In One Year | 14.601 | |||||||
Other Current Liabilities | 644.247 | |||||||
Total Current Liabilities | 6,734.204 | |||||||
Long Term Debt | 1,525.047 | |||||||
Deferred Taxes (Balance Sheet) | ||||||||
Investment Tax Credit | .000 | |||||||
Liabilities – Other | 1,131.088 | |||||||
Noncontrolling Interest – Redeemable | .000 | |||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES | 9,390.339 | |||||||
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Preferred Stock | .000 | |||||||
Common Stock | 1.535 | |||||||
Capital Surplus | 11,144.832 | |||||||
Retained Earnings (Net Other) | 13,938.933 | |||||||
Less: Treasury Stock | 7,155.421 | |||||||
Shareholders Equity – Parent | 17,929.879 | |||||||
Noncontrolling Interest – Nonredeemable | ||||||||
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | 17,929.879 | |||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | 27,320.218 | |||||||
INCOME STATEMENT | ||||||||
Fiscal Year: | 2011 | 2012 | ||||||
(FYR Ending): | (31DEC2011 ) | ( N/A ) | ||||||
Sales (Net) | 11,651.654 | |||||||
Cost of Goods Sold | 2,787.605 | |||||||
Gross Profit | 8,864.049 | |||||||
Selling, General, & Admin Expenses | 5,493.026 | |||||||
Operating Income Before Depreciation | 3,371.023 | |||||||
Depreciation, Depletion, & Amortiz | 939.953 | |||||||
Operating Income After Depreciation | 2,431.070 | |||||||
Interest Expense | 25.030 | |||||||
Non-Operating Income/Expense | 74.927 | |||||||
Special Items | 1,429.079 | |||||||
Pretax Income | 3,910.046 | |||||||
Income Taxes – Total | 680.659 | |||||||
Minority Interest | ||||||||
Income Before EI&DO | 3,229.387 | |||||||
Extraordinary Items | .000 | |||||||
Discontinued Operations | .000 | |||||||
Net Income (Loss) | 3,229.387 | |||||||
Income Before EI&DO | 3,229.387 | |||||||
Preferred Dividends | .000 | |||||||
Available for Common Before EI&DO | 3,229.387 | |||||||
Common Stock Equivalents – Savings | .000 | |||||||
Adjusted Available for Common | 3,229.387 | |||||||
EARNINGS PER SHARE | ||||||||
EPS – Primary, Excluding EI&DO | 2.500 | |||||||
EPS – Primary, Including EI&DO | 2.500 | |||||||
EPS – Fully Diluted, Excluding EI&DO | 2.460 | |||||||
EPS – Fully Diluted, Including EI&DO | 2.460 | |||||||
COMMON SHARES | ||||||||
Common Shares for Primary EPS Calculation | 1,292.775 | |||||||
Common Shares for Fully Diluted EPS Calc. | 1,312.950 | |||||||
Common Shares Outstanding at Fiscal Yr End | 1,286.487 | |||||||
Name: Amazon Inc.
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION |
|||
Fiscal Year: | 2010 | 2011 | |
(FYR Ending): | (31DEC2010 ) | (31DEC2011 ) | |
ASSETS | |||
Cash & Equivalents | 8,762.000 | 9,576.000 | |
Receivables – Total (Net) | 1,324.000 | 2,134.000 | |
Inventories – Total | 3,202.000 | 4,992.000 | |
Prepaid Expenses | .000 | .000 | |
Current Assets – Other | 459.000 | 788.000 | |
Current Assets – Total | 13,747.000 | 17,490.000 | |
Plant, Property & Equip (Gross) | 3,256.000 | 5,786.000 | |
Accumulated Depreciation | 842.000 | 1,369.000 | |
Plant, Property & Equip (Net) | 2,414.000 | 4,417.000 | |
Investments at Equity | 279.000 | 266.000 | |
Investments and Advances – Other | .000 | .000 | |
Intangibles | 1,912.000 | 2,602.000 | |
Deferred Charges | .000 | .000 | |
Assets – Other | 445.000 | 503.000 | |
TOTAL ASSETS | 18,797.000 | 25,278.000 | |
LIABILITIES | |||
Accounts Payable | 8,051.000 | 11,145.000 | |
Notes Payable | .000 | .000 | |
Accrued Expenses | |||
Taxes Payable | .000 | .000 | |
Debt (Long-Term) Due In One Year | 224.000 | 524.000 | |
Other Current Liabilities | 2,097.000 | 3,227.000 | |
Total Current Liabilities | 10,372.000 | 14,896.000 | |
Long Term Debt | 641.000 | 1,415.000 | |
Deferred Taxes (Balance Sheet) | |||
Investment Tax Credit | .000 | .000 | |
Liabilities – Other | 920.000 | 1,210.000 | |
Noncontrolling Interest – Redeemable | .000 | .000 | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | 11,933.000 | 17,521.000 | |
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |||
Preferred Stock | .000 | .000 | |
Common Stock | 5.000 | 5.000 | |
Capital Surplus | 6,325.000 | 6,990.000 | |
Retained Earnings (Net Other) | 1,134.000 | 1,639.000 | |
Less: Treasury Stock | 600.000 | 877.000 | |
Shareholders Equity – Parent | 6,864.000 | 7,757.000 | |
Noncontrolling Interest – Nonredeemable | .000 | .000 | |
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | 6,864.000 | 7,757.000 | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | 18,797.000 | 25,278.000 | |
INCOME STATEMENT | |||
Fiscal Year: | 2010 | 2011 | |
(FYR Ending): | (31DEC2010 ) | (31DEC2011 ) | |
Sales (Net) | 34,204.000 | 48,077.000 | |
Cost of Goods Sold | 26,009.000 | 36,288.000 | |
Gross Profit | 8,195.000 | 11,789.000 | |
Selling, General, & Admin Expenses | 6,131.000 | 9,773.000 | |
Operating Income Before Depreciation | 2,064.000 | 2,016.000 | |
Depreciation, Depletion, & Amortiz | 657.000 | 1,149.000 | |
Operating Income After Depreciation | 1,407.000 | 867.000 | |
Interest Expense | 39.000 | 65.000 | |
Non-Operating Income/Expense | 136.000 | 120.000 | |
Special Items | .000 | .000 | |
Pretax Income | 1,504.000 | 922.000 | |
Income Taxes – Total | 352.000 | 291.000 | |
Minority Interest | .000 | .000 | |
Income Before EI&DO | 1,152.000 | 631.000 | |
Extraordinary Items | .000 | .000 | |
Discontinued Operations | .000 | .000 | |
Net Income (Loss) | 1,152.000 | 631.000 | |
Income Before EI&DO | 1,152.000 | 631.000 | |
Preferred Dividends | .000 | .000 | |
Available for Common Before EI&DO | 1,152.000 | 631.000 | |
Common Stock Equivalents – Savings | .000 | .000 | |
Adjusted Available for Common | 1,152.000 | 631.000 | |
EARNINGS PER SHARE | |||
EPS – Primary, Excluding EI&DO | 2.580 | 1.390 | |
EPS – Primary, Including EI&DO | 2.580 | 1.390 | |
EPS – Fully Diluted, Excluding EI&DO | 2.530 | 1.370 | |
EPS – Fully Diluted, Including EI&DO | 2.530 | 1.370 | |
COMMON SHARES | |||
Common Shares for Primary EPS Calculation | 447.000 | 453.000 | |
Common Shares for Fully Diluted EPS Calc. | 456.000 | 461.000 | |
Common Shares Outstanding at Fiscal Yr End | 451.000 | 455.000 | |
References:
- “Amazon.com.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 13 Apr. 2013. Web. 15 Apr. 2013.
- (2010&2011).Amazon Inc.: Company profile.Feb.20, 2013, from Business Source Complete database
- (2011).EBay Inc.: Company profile.Feb.20, 2013, from Business Source Complete database
- “EBay.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 14 Apr. 2013. Web. 15 Apr. 2013.
- Standard & Poor’s (2010&2011).Amazon Inc…20, 2013, from Compustat database.
- Standard & Poor’s (2011).EBay Inc.: Complete Financial Statements 2011. 20, 2012, from Compustat database
Amazon Vs Ebay
Amazon Vs Ebay Amazon Vs Ebay Amazon Vs Ebay Amazon Vs Ebay Amazon Vs Ebay Amazon Vs Ebay Amazon Vs Ebay Amazon Vs Ebay Amazon Vs Ebay
Thanks for taking a look at our sample papers
Do you need any help with your assignment?
Our aim is to help you get the best grades for your Coursework.
We are very confident in our quality of work that we offer you 100% Money back guarantee
Header Button Label: Get StartedGet Started